PortfoliosLab logo
LOCT vs. KLIP
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between LOCT and KLIP is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

LOCT vs. KLIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - October (LOCT) and KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LOCT:

0.97

KLIP:

0.18

Sortino Ratio

LOCT:

1.53

KLIP:

0.33

Omega Ratio

LOCT:

1.37

KLIP:

1.05

Calmar Ratio

LOCT:

1.11

KLIP:

0.16

Martin Ratio

LOCT:

8.34

KLIP:

0.64

Ulcer Index

LOCT:

0.62%

KLIP:

4.58%

Daily Std Dev

LOCT:

5.31%

KLIP:

20.75%

Max Drawdown

LOCT:

-4.68%

KLIP:

-18.61%

Current Drawdown

LOCT:

-0.04%

KLIP:

-4.80%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LOCT achieves a 1.93% return, which is significantly lower than KLIP's 4.64% return.


LOCT

YTD

1.93%

1M

1.29%

6M

2.26%

1Y

5.09%

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

KLIP

YTD

4.64%

1M

1.92%

6M

6.48%

1Y

3.72%

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LOCT vs. KLIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

LOCT has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than KLIP's 0.95% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

LOCT vs. KLIP — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LOCT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LOCT is 8484
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LOCT is 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LOCT is 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LOCT is 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LOCT is 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LOCT is 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

KLIP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of KLIP is 2323
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of KLIP is 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of KLIP is 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of KLIP is 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of KLIP is 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of KLIP is 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LOCT vs. KLIP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - October (LOCT) and KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current LOCT Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is higher than the KLIP Sharpe Ratio of 0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LOCT and KLIP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

LOCT vs. KLIP - Dividend Comparison

LOCT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.76%, less than KLIP's 42.34% yield.


Drawdowns

LOCT vs. KLIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LOCT drawdown since its inception was -4.68%, smaller than the maximum KLIP drawdown of -18.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOCT and KLIP.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

LOCT vs. KLIP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - October (LOCT) is 0.75%, while KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP) has a volatility of 3.04%. This indicates that LOCT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KLIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...