SMU vs. QTAP

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

SMU (Tradr 2X Long SMR Daily ETF) and QTAP (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SMU returned -99.22% vs 20.69% for QTAP. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMU charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTAP.

Performance

SMU vs. QTAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long SMR Daily ETF (SMU) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMU achieves a -84.70% return, which is significantly lower than QTAP's 13.89% return.

SMU

• 1D: -16.70%
• 1M: -44.43%
• 6M: -90.92%
• YTD: -84.70%
• 1Y: -99.22%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QTAP

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: -0.16%
• 6M: 13.32%
• YTD: 13.89%
• 1Y: 20.69%
• 3Y*: 18.98%
• 5Y*: 12.67%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMU vs. QTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SMU Tradr 2X Long SMR Daily ETF	-84.70%	-91.57%
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April	13.89%	6.03%

Correlation

The correlation between SMU and QTAP is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2025	0.41

Return for Risk

SMU vs. QTAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMU

SMU Risk / Return Rank: 2
SMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
SMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
SMU Omega Ratio Rank: 1
SMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
SMU Martin Ratio Rank: 3

QTAP

QTAP Risk / Return Rank: 97
QTAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
QTAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
QTAP Omega Ratio Rank: 97
QTAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
QTAP Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMU vs. QTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long SMR Daily ETF (SMU) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SMU	QTAP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.50	3.34	-3.83
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.02	5.37	-7.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.79	1.81	-1.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-1.00	8.34	-9.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.19	42.65	-43.84

SMU vs. QTAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMU Sharpe Ratio is -0.50, which is lower than the QTAP Sharpe Ratio of 3.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMU and QTAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SMU vs. QTAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMU drawdown since its inception was -99.35%, which is greater than QTAP's maximum drawdown of -29.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMU and QTAP.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMU	QTAP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.35%	-29.44%	-69.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-99.35%	-2.49%	-96.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.03%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.44%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.35%	-0.78%	-98.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-78.19%	-4.94%	-73.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	83.46%	0.49%	+82.97%

Volatility

SMU vs. QTAP - Volatility Comparison

Tradr 2X Long SMR Daily ETF (SMU) has a higher volatility of 44.07% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) at 2.45%. This indicates that SMU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SMU	QTAP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	44.07%	2.45%	+41.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	132.95%	5.24%	+127.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	199.44%	6.23%	+193.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	200.29%	18.92%	+181.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	200.29%	18.62%	+181.67%

SMU vs. QTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMU has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than QTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

SMU vs. QTAP - Dividend Comparison

Neither SMU nor QTAP has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMU and QTAP in my portfolio?

SMU and QTAP have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SMU or QTAP?

SMU has higher volatility (44.07%) compared to QTAP (2.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMU dropped -99.35% vs QTAP's -29.44%.

Which ETF is better, SMU or QTAP?

On 1-year performance, QTAP leads with 20.69% vs -99.22% for SMU. On fees, QTAP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QTAP has been the lower-risk option at 2.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SMU or QTAP?

Over the 1-year period, QTAP has performed better with a 20.69% return vs -99.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SMU or QTAP?

QTAP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for SMU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SMU or QTAP?

SMU and QTAP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between SMU and QTAP?

They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for SMU and 0.79% for QTAP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QTAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.34 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.