SMU vs. SNXX
SMU (Tradr 2X Long SMR Daily ETF) and SNXX (Tradr 2X Long SNDK Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Tradr. Both are actively managed. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMU charges 1.30%/yr vs 1.49%/yr for SNXX.
Performance
SMU vs. SNXX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SMU
- 1D
- -8.13%
- 1M
- -13.60%
- YTD
- -65.34%
- 6M
- -74.59%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SNXX
- 1D
- 8.18%
- 1M
- 117.47%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMU vs. SNXX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SMU Tradr 2X Long SMR Daily ETF | -77.65% |
SNXX Tradr 2X Long SNDK Daily ETF | 1,309.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMU and SNXX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2026 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMU vs. SNXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long SMR Daily ETF (SMU) and Tradr 2X Long SNDK Daily ETF (SNXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMU vs. SNXX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMU drawdown since its inception was -98.96%, which is greater than SNXX's maximum drawdown of -48.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMU and SNXX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMU | SNXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.96% | -48.39% | -50.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.53% | 0.00% | -98.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -76.71% | -14.75% | -61.96% |
Volatility
SMU vs. SNXX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMU | SNXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 204.83% | 196.92% | +7.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 204.83% | 196.92% | +7.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 204.83% | 196.92% | +7.91% |
SMU vs. SNXX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMU has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than SNXX's 1.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMU vs. SNXX - Dividend Comparison
Neither SMU nor SNXX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SMU and SNXX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SMU is cheaper at 1.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SMU is cheaper with a 1.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for SNXX.
SMU and SNXX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Their fees differ too: 1.30% for SMU and 1.49% for SNXX.
Find the right allocation for SMU and SNXX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer