SMU vs. FUTG
SMU (Tradr 2X Long SMR Daily ETF) and FUTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMU charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FUTG.
Performance
SMU vs. FUTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMU achieves a -55.15% return, which is significantly higher than FUTG's -75.53% return.
SMU
- 1D
- -24.09%
- 1M
- -8.19%
- YTD
- -55.15%
- 6M
- -79.54%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FUTG
- 1D
- -11.10%
- 1M
- -70.24%
- YTD
- -75.53%
- 6M
- -77.00%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMU vs. FUTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SMU Tradr 2X Long SMR Daily ETF | -55.15% | -93.25% |
FUTG Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF | -75.53% | -0.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMU and FUTG is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMU vs. FUTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long SMR Daily ETF (SMU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF (FUTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMU | FUTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.48 | -0.66 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
SMU vs. FUTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMU drawdown since its inception was -98.68%, which is greater than FUTG's maximum drawdown of -86.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMU and FUTG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMU | FUTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.68% | -86.19% | -12.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.10% | -84.29% | -13.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -75.88% | -40.35% | -35.53% |
Volatility
SMU vs. FUTG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMU | FUTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 204.10% | 136.01% | +68.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 204.10% | 136.01% | +68.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 204.10% | 136.01% | +68.09% |
SMU vs. FUTG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMU has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than FUTG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMU vs. FUTG - Dividend Comparison
Neither SMU nor FUTG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SMU and FUTG have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FUTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FUTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for SMU.
SMU and FUTG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for SMU and 0.75% for FUTG.
Find the right allocation for SMU and FUTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer