SMU vs. MUU

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

SMU (Tradr 2X Long SMR Daily ETF) and MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. SMU is actively managed, while MUU is passively managed. Over the past year, SMU returned -98.97% vs 2805.45% for MUU. Their 0.34 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SMU charges 1.30%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for MUU.

Performance

SMU vs. MUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long SMR Daily ETF (SMU) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMU achieves a -82.38% return, which is significantly lower than MUU's 372.51% return.

SMU

• 1D: -4.21%
• 1M: -31.75%
• 6M: -87.18%
• YTD: -82.38%
• 1Y: -98.97%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -98.16%

MUU

• 1D: -12.24%
• 1M: -36.47%
• 6M: 134.93%
• YTD: 372.51%
• 1Y: 2,805.45%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 419.04%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares	$1.51B	$1.57B	$2.27B
SMU Tradr 2X Long SMR Daily ETF	$8.65M	$9.72M	$17.75M

SMU vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SMU Tradr 2X Long SMR Daily ETF	-82.38%	-91.57%
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares	372.51%	338.01%

Correlation

The correlation between SMU and MUU is 0.36, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2025	0.34

Return for Risk

SMU vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SMU

SMU Risk / Return Rank: 2
SMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
SMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
SMU Omega Ratio Rank: 1
SMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
SMU Martin Ratio Rank: 3

MUU

MUU Risk / Return Rank: 98
MUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
MUU Omega Ratio Rank: 96
MUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
MUU Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SMU vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long SMR Daily ETF (SMU) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SMU	MUU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.49	16.13	-16.62
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.98	4.86	-6.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.80	1.61	-0.81
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-1.00	38.27	-39.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.18	127.21	-128.40

SMU vs. MUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMU Sharpe Ratio is -0.49, which is lower than the MUU Sharpe Ratio of 16.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMU and MUU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SMU vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMU drawdown since its inception was -99.39%, which is greater than MUU's maximum drawdown of -75.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMU and MUU.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMU	MUU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.39%	-75.07%	-24.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-99.27%	-68.07%	-31.20%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.25%	-61.50%	-37.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-79.07%	-24.34%	-54.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	85.27%	20.44%	+64.83%

Volatility

SMU vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tradr 2X Long SMR Daily ETF (SMU) is 52.39%, while Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) has a volatility of 62.16%. This indicates that SMU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SMU	MUU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	52.39%	62.16%	-9.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	134.27%	134.20%	+0.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	200.59%	161.94%	+38.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	200.68%	146.71%	+53.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	200.68%	146.71%	+53.97%

SMU vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMU has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than MUU's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

SMU vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison

SMU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MUU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares	1.44%	4.27%	0.31%
SMU Tradr 2X Long SMR Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMU and MUU in my portfolio?

SMU and MUU have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SMU or MUU?

MUU has higher volatility (62.16%) compared to SMU (52.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMU dropped -99.39% vs MUU's -75.07%.

Which ETF is better, SMU or MUU?

On 1-year performance, MUU leads with 2805.45% vs -98.97% for SMU. On fees, MUU is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, SMU has been the lower-risk option at 52.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SMU or MUU?

Over the 1-year period, MUU has performed better with a 2805.45% return vs -98.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SMU or MUU?

MUU is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for SMU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SMU or MUU?

MUU has the higher dividend yield at 1.44%, compared with 0.00% for SMU.

What is the main difference between SMU and MUU?

They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for SMU and 1.01% for MUU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (16.13 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.