PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMTH vs. REIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMTH vs. REIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF (SMTH) and ALPS Active REIT ETF (REIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMTH achieves a 0.34% return, which is significantly lower than REIT's 12.80% return.


SMTH

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.44%
YTD
0.34%
6M
0.02%
1Y
5.19%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

REIT

1D
0.05%
1M
0.26%
YTD
12.80%
6M
12.21%
1Y
13.48%
3Y*
10.38%
5Y*
4.37%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMTH vs. REIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SMTH
ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF
0.34%6.86%2.76%3.49%
REIT
ALPS Active REIT ETF
12.80%-0.55%7.11%7.59%

Correlation

The correlation between SMTH and REIT is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2023

0.38

SMTH vs. REIT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SMTH
REIT

Energy

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

100.0%

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Energy

SMTH
100.0%
REIT

-

Basic Materials

SMTH

-

REIT

-

Communication Services

SMTH

-

REIT

-

Consumer Cyclical

SMTH

-

REIT

-

Consumer Defensive

SMTH

-

REIT

-

Financial Services

SMTH

-

REIT

-

Healthcare

SMTH

-

REIT

-

Industrials

SMTH

-

REIT

-

Real Estate

SMTH

-

REIT
100.0%

Technology

SMTH

-

REIT

-

Utilities

SMTH

-

REIT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMTH vs. REIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMTH
SMTH Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
SMTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMTH Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
SMTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMTH Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

REIT
REIT Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
REIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
REIT Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
REIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
REIT Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMTH vs. REIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF (SMTH) and ALPS Active REIT ETF (REIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMTHREITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.19

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

1.84

+0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.72

5.33

+0.38

SMTH vs. REIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMTH Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is comparable to the REIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMTH and REIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMTHREITDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.34

1.06

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.19

0.39

+0.80

Drawdowns

SMTH vs. REIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMTH drawdown since its inception was -4.11%, smaller than the maximum REIT drawdown of -29.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMTH and REIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMTHREITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.11%

-29.30%

+25.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.74%

-7.35%

+4.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.41%

-2.65%

+1.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.06%

-10.38%

+9.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.91%

2.53%

-1.62%

Volatility

SMTH vs. REIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF (SMTH) is 1.31%, while ALPS Active REIT ETF (REIT) has a volatility of 3.80%. This indicates that SMTH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than REIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMTHREITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.31%

3.80%

-2.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.66%

9.01%

-6.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.88%

12.78%

-8.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.59%

18.45%

-13.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.59%

18.38%

-13.79%

SMTH vs. REIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMTH has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than REIT's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMTH vs. REIT - Dividend Comparison

SMTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, more than REIT's 2.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
REIT
ALPS Active REIT ETF
2.80%3.20%3.06%3.13%2.81%4.71%
SMTH
ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF
4.40%4.46%4.58%0.24%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMTH and REIT have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

REIT has higher volatility (3.80%) compared to SMTH (1.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMTH dropped -4.11% vs REIT's -29.30%.

On 1-year performance, REIT leads with 13.48% vs 5.19% for SMTH. On fees, SMTH is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, SMTH has been the lower-risk option at 1.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, REIT has performed better with a 13.48% return vs 5.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SMTH is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for REIT.

SMTH has the higher dividend yield at 4.40%, compared with 2.80% for REIT.

SMTH is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while REIT is REIT. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for SMTH and 0.68% for REIT.

SMTH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMTH and REIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer