PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMTH vs. MBS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SMTH vs. MBS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF (SMTH) and Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (MBS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SMTH vs. MBS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SMTH
ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF
-0.18%6.86%4.06%
MBS
Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF
0.29%8.13%5.78%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMTH achieves a -0.18% return, which is significantly lower than MBS's 0.29% return.


SMTH

1D
0.29%
1M
-1.92%
YTD
-0.18%
6M
0.56%
1Y
3.97%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MBS

1D
-0.09%
1M
-1.73%
YTD
0.29%
6M
1.91%
1Y
5.36%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SMTH vs. MBS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMTH has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than MBS's 0.49% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SMTH vs. MBS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMTH
SMTH Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
SMTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMTH Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
SMTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMTH Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

MBS
MBS Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
MBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBS Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
MBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBS Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMTH vs. MBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF (SMTH) and Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (MBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMTHMBSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.93

1.51

-0.58

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.34

2.06

-0.71

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.29

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.56

2.36

-0.80

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.70

6.59

-1.89

SMTH vs. MBS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMTH Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is lower than the MBS Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMTH and MBS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMTHMBSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

1.51

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.22

1.66

-0.44

Correlation

The correlation between SMTH and MBS is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

SMTH vs. MBS - Dividend Comparison

SMTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.42%, less than MBS's 5.47% yield.


TTM202520242023
SMTH
ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF
4.42%4.46%4.58%0.24%
MBS
Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF
5.47%5.28%4.52%0.00%

Drawdowns

SMTH vs. MBS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMTH drawdown since its inception was -4.11%, roughly equal to the maximum MBS drawdown of -4.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMTH and MBS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SMTHMBSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.11%

-4.09%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.74%

-2.54%

-0.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.92%

-1.79%

-0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.02%

-0.99%

-0.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.91%

0.91%

0.00%

Volatility

SMTH vs. MBS - Volatility Comparison

ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF (SMTH) has a higher volatility of 1.59% compared to Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (MBS) at 1.01%. This indicates that SMTH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SMTHMBSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.59%

1.01%

+0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.49%

2.02%

+0.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.31%

3.62%

+0.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.64%

4.08%

+0.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.64%

4.08%

+0.56%