SMRI vs. DIVB
SMRI (Bushido Capital US Equity ETF) and DIVB (iShares Core Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMRI is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Bushido, while DIVB is a Dividend fund tracking the Morningstar US Dividend and Buyback Index. SMRI is actively managed, while DIVB is passively managed. Over the past year, SMRI returned 40.59% vs 36.31% for DIVB. Their correlation of 0.83 means they have usually moved in the same direction. SMRI charges 0.71%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for DIVB.
Performance
SMRI vs. DIVB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMRI achieves a 23.03% return, which is significantly lower than DIVB's 25.34% return.
SMRI
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 5.51%
- 6M
- 23.61%
- YTD
- 23.03%
- 1Y
- 40.59%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 22.95%
DIVB
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 3.88%
- 6M
- 20.82%
- YTD
- 25.34%
- 1Y
- 36.31%
- 3Y*
- 21.50%
- 5Y*
- 13.37%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.50%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $13.36M | $10.66M | $7.75M | |
| $770.42K | $508.81K | $403.01K |
SMRI vs. DIVB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SMRI Bushido Capital US Equity ETF | 23.03% | 17.41% | 19.16% | 5.27% |
DIVB iShares Core Dividend ETF | 25.34% | 15.09% | 18.59% | 7.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMRI and DIVB is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2023 | 0.83 |
The correlation between SMRI and DIVB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMRI vs. DIVB — Risk / Return Rank
SMRI
DIVB
SMRI vs. DIVB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bushido Capital US Equity ETF (SMRI) and iShares Core Dividend ETF (DIVB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMRI | DIVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.51 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.75 | 5.11 | +0.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.88 | 17.69 | -0.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMRI vs. DIVB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMRI drawdown since its inception was -18.45%, smaller than the maximum DIVB drawdown of -36.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMRI and DIVB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMRI | DIVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.45% | -36.93% | +18.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.80% | -6.82% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.45% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.51% | -1.26% | +0.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.72% | -4.92% | +2.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.32% | 1.97% | +0.35% |
Volatility
SMRI vs. DIVB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Bushido Capital US Equity ETF (SMRI) is 3.61%, while iShares Core Dividend ETF (DIVB) has a volatility of 5.32%. This indicates that SMRI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIVB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMRI | DIVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.61% | 5.32% | -1.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.80% | 9.83% | +1.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.09% | 12.54% | +2.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.84% | 15.38% | +0.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.84% | 18.35% | -2.51% |
SMRI vs. DIVB - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMRI has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than DIVB's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMRI vs. DIVB - Dividend Comparison
SMRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than DIVB's 2.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVB iShares Core Dividend ETF | 2.12% | 2.50% | 2.61% | 3.18% | 2.02% | 1.63% | 2.08% | 2.07% | 2.52% | 0.37% |
SMRI Bushido Capital US Equity ETF | 0.86% | 1.32% | 0.98% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMRI and DIVB have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DIVB has higher volatility (5.32%) compared to SMRI (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMRI dropped -18.45% vs DIVB's -36.93%.
On 1-year performance, SMRI leads with 40.59% vs 36.31% for DIVB. On fees, DIVB is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, SMRI has been the lower-risk option at 3.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SMRI has performed better with a 40.59% return vs 36.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DIVB is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for SMRI.
DIVB has the higher dividend yield at 2.12%, compared with 0.86% for SMRI.
SMRI is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while DIVB is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Bushido and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.71% for SMRI and 0.05% for DIVB.
DIVB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMRI and DIVB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer