SMRI vs. PZLV
SMRI (Bushido Capital US Equity ETF) and PZLV (Pzena U.S. Large Cap Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.68 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SMRI charges 0.71%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PZLV.
Performance
SMRI vs. PZLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SMRI
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 5.51%
- 6M
- 23.61%
- YTD
- 23.03%
- 1Y
- 40.59%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 22.95%
PZLV
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- 5.17%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $74.79K | $52.72K | $44.34K | |
| $770.42K | $508.81K | $403.01K |
SMRI vs. PZLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SMRI Bushido Capital US Equity ETF | 25.41% |
PZLV Pzena U.S. Large Cap Value ETF | 21.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMRI and PZLV is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2026 | 0.68 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMRI vs. PZLV — Risk / Return Rank
SMRI
PZLV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SMRI vs. PZLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bushido Capital US Equity ETF (SMRI) and Pzena U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (PZLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMRI | PZLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.75 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.88 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMRI vs. PZLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMRI drawdown since its inception was -18.45%, which is greater than PZLV's maximum drawdown of -2.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMRI and PZLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMRI | PZLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.45% | -2.81% | -15.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.51% | -1.20% | +0.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.72% | -0.74% | -1.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.32% | — | — |
Volatility
SMRI vs. PZLV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMRI | PZLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.61% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.80% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.09% | 14.93% | +0.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.84% | 14.93% | +0.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.84% | 14.93% | +0.91% |
SMRI vs. PZLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMRI has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than PZLV's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMRI vs. PZLV - Dividend Comparison
SMRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, while PZLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PZLV Pzena U.S. Large Cap Value ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMRI Bushido Capital US Equity ETF | 0.86% | 1.32% | 0.98% | 0.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMRI and PZLV have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PZLV is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PZLV is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for SMRI.
SMRI has the higher dividend yield at 0.86%, compared with 0.00% for PZLV.
They also come from different issuers: Bushido and Pzena. Their fees differ too: 0.71% for SMRI and 0.60% for PZLV.
Find the right allocation for SMRI and PZLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer