SMR vs. LUNR
SMR (NuScale Power Corporation) and LUNR (Intuitive Machines Inc. ) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — SMR in Specialty Industrial Machinery, LUNR in Aerospace & Defense. Over the past 3 years, SMR returned 5.43%/yr vs 42.24%/yr for LUNR. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SMR vs. LUNR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMR achieves a -30.20% return, which is significantly lower than LUNR's 64.02% return.
SMR
- 1D
- 3.34%
- 1M
- -17.31%
- YTD
- -30.20%
- 6M
- -46.07%
- 1Y
- -75.51%
- 3Y*
- 5.43%
- 5Y*
- -0.32%
- 10Y*
- —
LUNR
- 1D
- -13.12%
- 1M
- -25.39%
- YTD
- 64.02%
- 6M
- 122.39%
- 1Y
- 144.44%
- 3Y*
- 42.24%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMR vs. LUNR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMR NuScale Power Corporation | -30.20% | -20.97% | 444.98% | -67.93% | 2.29% | 0.70% |
LUNR Intuitive Machines Inc. | 64.02% | -10.63% | 610.76% | -74.45% | 3.73% | -0.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMR and LUNR is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2021 | 0.31 |
Over the past year, SMR and LUNR have become more correlated (0.52) than their long-term average of 0.31, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
SMR:
$3.16B
LUNR:
$3.94T
SMR:
-$2.02
LUNR:
-$0.00
SMR:
104.42
LUNR:
2.95K
SMR:
$18.10M
LUNR:
$334.27M
SMR:
$4.45M
LUNR:
$85.92M
SMR:
-$696.20M
LUNR:
-$96.76M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMR vs. LUNR — Risk / Return Rank
SMR
LUNR
SMR vs. LUNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NuScale Power Corporation (SMR) and Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMR | LUNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.26 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.91 | 3.47 | -4.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.32 | 7.12 | -8.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMR vs. LUNR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMR drawdown since its inception was -87.47%, smaller than the maximum LUNR drawdown of -97.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMR and LUNR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMR | LUNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.47% | -97.43% | +9.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -82.86% | -41.94% | -40.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -82.86% | -78.54% | -4.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -87.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -81.49% | -67.53% | -13.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.08% | -63.21% | +28.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 57.39% | 20.37% | +37.02% |
Volatility
SMR vs. LUNR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for NuScale Power Corporation (SMR) is 28.93%, while Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR) has a volatility of 42.95%. This indicates that SMR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LUNR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMR | LUNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 28.93% | 42.95% | -14.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 69.57% | 93.42% | -23.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 102.59% | 111.16% | -8.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 93.50% | 171.29% | -77.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 89.31% | 171.29% | -81.98% |
Dividends
SMR vs. LUNR - Dividend Comparison
Neither SMR nor LUNR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
SMR vs. LUNR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NuScale Power Corporation and Intuitive Machines Inc. . You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
SMR and LUNR have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LUNR has higher volatility (42.95%) compared to SMR (28.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMR dropped -87.47% vs LUNR's -97.43%.
LUNR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs -0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMR and LUNR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer