SMOX vs. PWC
SMOX (Horizon Small/Mid Cap Core Equity ETF) and PWC (Invesco Dynamic Market ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. SMOX is actively managed, while PWC is passively managed. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SMOX charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PWC.
Performance
SMOX vs. PWC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMOX achieves a 17.11% return, which is significantly higher than PWC's 5.85% return.
SMOX
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 2.23%
- YTD
- 17.11%
- 6M
- 17.62%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PWC
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 5.85%
- 6M
- 6.04%
- 1Y
- 8.50%
- 3Y*
- 13.71%
- 5Y*
- 6.10%
- 10Y*
- 9.52%
SMOX vs. PWC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SMOX Horizon Small/Mid Cap Core Equity ETF | 17.11% | 0.44% |
PWC Invesco Dynamic Market ETF | 5.85% | 0.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMOX and PWC is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2025 | 0.71 |
SMOX vs. PWC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SMOX
PWC
Industrials
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Energy
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
SMOX
PWC
Financial Services
SMOX
PWC
Technology
SMOX
PWC
Consumer Cyclical
SMOX
PWC
Healthcare
SMOX
PWC
Energy
SMOX
PWC
Real Estate
SMOX
PWC
Consumer Defensive
SMOX
PWC
Basic Materials
SMOX
PWC
Utilities
SMOX
PWC
Communication Services
SMOX
PWC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMOX vs. PWC — Risk / Return Rank
SMOX
PWC
SMOX vs. PWC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Small/Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (SMOX) and Invesco Dynamic Market ETF (PWC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMOX | PWC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.52 | 0.11 | +2.41 |
Drawdowns
SMOX vs. PWC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMOX drawdown since its inception was -7.76%, smaller than the maximum PWC drawdown of -78.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMOX and PWC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMOX | PWC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.76% | -78.13% | +70.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.45% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.04% | -2.37% | +2.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.49% | -36.21% | +34.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.10% | — |
Volatility
SMOX vs. PWC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMOX | PWC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.14% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.19% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.55% | 9.75% | +5.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.55% | 16.07% | -0.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.55% | 18.81% | -3.26% |
SMOX vs. PWC - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMOX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than PWC's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMOX vs. PWC - Dividend Comparison
SMOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than PWC's 1.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PWC Invesco Dynamic Market ETF | 1.68% | 1.77% | 1.58% | 1.67% | 1.51% | 0.56% | 1.09% | 0.95% | 1.44% | 1.75% | 1.35% | 1.02% |
SMOX Horizon Small/Mid Cap Core Equity ETF | 0.07% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMOX and PWC have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PWC is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PWC is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SMOX.
PWC has the higher dividend yield at 1.68%, compared with 0.07% for SMOX.
They also come from different issuers: Horizon and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SMOX and 0.60% for PWC.
Find the right allocation for SMOX and PWC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer