SMOT vs. BIZD
SMOT (VanEck Morningstar SMID Moat ETF) and BIZD (VanEck BDC Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMOT is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Small-Mid Cap Moat Focus, while BIZD is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MVIS US Business Development Companies Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SMOT returned 12.55%/yr vs 5.96%/yr for BIZD. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SMOT charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for BIZD.
Performance
SMOT vs. BIZD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMOT achieves a 8.04% return, which is significantly higher than BIZD's -6.93% return.
SMOT
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 4.43%
- YTD
- 8.04%
- 6M
- 8.53%
- 1Y
- 18.20%
- 3Y*
- 12.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BIZD
- 1D
- 2.25%
- 1M
- -4.94%
- YTD
- -6.93%
- 6M
- -8.73%
- 1Y
- -10.64%
- 3Y*
- 5.96%
- 5Y*
- 4.49%
- 10Y*
- 7.97%
SMOT vs. BIZD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMOT VanEck Morningstar SMID Moat ETF | 8.04% | 6.46% | 10.71% | 17.31% | 5.41% |
BIZD VanEck BDC Income ETF | -6.93% | -4.96% | 15.63% | 27.02% | 5.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMOT and BIZD is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2022 | 0.62 |
The correlation between SMOT and BIZD shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SMOT vs. BIZD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SMOT
BIZD
Technology
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
-
Technology
SMOT
BIZD
-
Healthcare
SMOT
BIZD
-
Consumer Cyclical
SMOT
BIZD
-
Industrials
SMOT
BIZD
-
Basic Materials
SMOT
BIZD
-
Consumer Defensive
SMOT
BIZD
-
Financial Services
SMOT
BIZD
Energy
SMOT
BIZD
-
Utilities
SMOT
BIZD
-
Real Estate
SMOT
BIZD
-
Communication Services
SMOT
BIZD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMOT vs. BIZD — Risk / Return Rank
SMOT
BIZD
SMOT vs. BIZD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar SMID Moat ETF (SMOT) and VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMOT | BIZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 0.92 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.05 | -0.48 | +2.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.57 | -0.84 | +7.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMOT | BIZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.29 | -0.59 | +1.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.26 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.31 | +0.41 |
Drawdowns
SMOT vs. BIZD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMOT drawdown since its inception was -23.36%, smaller than the maximum BIZD drawdown of -55.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMOT and BIZD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMOT | BIZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.36% | -55.44% | +32.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.91% | -22.22% | +13.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.36% | -22.56% | -0.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -55.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -17.45% | +17.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.81% | -6.72% | +1.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.78% | 12.68% | -9.90% |
Volatility
SMOT vs. BIZD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Morningstar SMID Moat ETF (SMOT) is 3.03%, while VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD) has a volatility of 5.39%. This indicates that SMOT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BIZD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMOT | BIZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.03% | 5.39% | -2.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.50% | 14.95% | -5.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.12% | 18.25% | -4.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.42% | 17.43% | +0.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.42% | 21.74% | -3.32% |
SMOT vs. BIZD - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMOT has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than BIZD's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMOT vs. BIZD - Dividend Comparison
SMOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, less than BIZD's 13.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIZD VanEck BDC Income ETF | 13.57% | 11.78% | 10.94% | 10.96% | 11.21% | 8.14% | 10.39% | 9.13% | 10.88% | 9.13% | 8.51% | 9.12% |
SMOT VanEck Morningstar SMID Moat ETF | 1.27% | 1.37% | 1.18% | 0.65% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMOT and BIZD have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BIZD has higher volatility (5.39%) compared to SMOT (3.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMOT dropped -23.36% vs BIZD's -55.44%.
On 3-year performance, SMOT leads with 12.55% vs 5.96% for BIZD. On fees, BIZD is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, SMOT has been the lower-risk option at 3.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SMOT has performed better with a 12.55% return vs 5.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BIZD is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for SMOT.
BIZD has the higher dividend yield at 13.57%, compared with 1.27% for SMOT.
SMOT is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while BIZD is Financials Equities. SMOT tracks Morningstar US Small-Mid Cap Moat Focus, while BIZD tracks MVIS US Business Development Companies Index. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for SMOT and 0.42% for BIZD.
SMOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMOT and BIZD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer