SMOM vs. PRN
SMOM (Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF) and PRN (Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMOM is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Symmetry Partners, while PRN is a Momentum fund tracking the DWA Industrials Technical Leaders Index. SMOM is actively managed, while PRN is passively managed. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SMOM charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PRN.
Performance
SMOM vs. PRN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMOM achieves a 9.82% return, which is significantly lower than PRN's 41.80% return.
SMOM
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 5.93%
- YTD
- 9.82%
- 6M
- 10.58%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PRN
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 6.86%
- YTD
- 41.80%
- 6M
- 45.38%
- 1Y
- 65.12%
- 3Y*
- 36.96%
- 5Y*
- 20.18%
- 10Y*
- 18.51%
SMOM vs. PRN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SMOM Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF | 9.82% | 2.81% |
PRN Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF | 41.80% | 5.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMOM and PRN is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2025 | 0.72 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMOM vs. PRN — Risk / Return Rank
SMOM
PRN
SMOM vs. PRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF (SMOM) and Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMOM | PRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.45 | 0.52 | +0.92 |
Drawdowns
SMOM vs. PRN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMOM drawdown since its inception was -7.45%, smaller than the maximum PRN drawdown of -59.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMOM and PRN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMOM | PRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.45% | -59.88% | +52.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -30.78% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.47% | +0.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.48% | -10.84% | +9.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.23% | — |
Volatility
SMOM vs. PRN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMOM | PRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.95% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 23.22% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.62% | 28.66% | -16.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.62% | 25.03% | -12.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.62% | 24.17% | -11.55% |
SMOM vs. PRN - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMOM has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than PRN's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMOM vs. PRN - Dividend Comparison
SMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, more than PRN's 0.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRN Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF | 0.11% | 0.17% | 0.39% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 0.11% | 0.10% | 0.42% | 0.29% | 0.60% | 0.57% | 0.44% |
SMOM Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF | 0.15% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMOM and PRN have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PRN is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PRN is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for SMOM.
SMOM has the higher dividend yield at 0.15%, compared with 0.11% for PRN.
SMOM is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while PRN is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Symmetry Partners and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for SMOM and 0.60% for PRN.
Find the right allocation for SMOM and PRN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer