SMOM vs. PRN
SMOM (Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF) and PRN (Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMOM is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Symmetry Partners, while PRN is a Momentum fund tracking the DWA Industrials Technical Leaders Index. SMOM is actively managed, while PRN is passively managed. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SMOM charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PRN.
Performance
SMOM vs. PRN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMOM achieves a 8.42% return, which is significantly lower than PRN's 31.96% return.
SMOM
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- 6M
- 6.76%
- YTD
- 8.42%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PRN
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- -4.85%
- 6M
- 24.45%
- YTD
- 31.96%
- 1Y
- 47.33%
- 3Y*
- 29.80%
- 5Y*
- 18.66%
- 10Y*
- 17.11%
SMOM vs. PRN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SMOM Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF | 8.42% | 2.78% |
PRN Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF | 31.96% | 7.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMOM and PRN is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2025 | 0.70 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMOM vs. PRN — Risk / Return Rank
SMOM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PRN
SMOM vs. PRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF (SMOM) and Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMOM | PRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.26 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.39 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.17 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMOM vs. PRN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMOM drawdown since its inception was -7.45%, smaller than the maximum PRN drawdown of -59.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMOM and PRN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMOM | PRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.45% | -59.88% | +52.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -30.78% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.27% | -12.29% | +11.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.52% | -10.81% | +9.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.71% | — |
Volatility
SMOM vs. PRN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMOM | PRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 14.09% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 25.90% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.58% | 31.98% | -19.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.58% | 25.77% | -13.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.58% | 24.56% | -11.98% |
SMOM vs. PRN - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMOM has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than PRN's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMOM vs. PRN - Dividend Comparison
SMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, more than PRN's 0.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRN Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF | 0.09% | 0.17% | 0.39% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 0.11% | 0.10% | 0.42% | 0.29% | 0.60% | 0.57% | 0.44% |
SMOM Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF | 0.15% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMOM and PRN have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PRN is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PRN is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for SMOM.
SMOM has the higher dividend yield at 0.15%, compared with 0.09% for PRN.
SMOM is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while PRN is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Symmetry Partners and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for SMOM and 0.60% for PRN.
Find the right allocation for SMOM and PRN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer