PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMOG vs. YCS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMOG vs. YCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF (SMOG) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMOG achieves a 18.16% return, which is significantly higher than YCS's 7.17% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SMOG having a 12.70% annualized return and YCS not far behind at 12.34%.


SMOG

1D
-1.20%
1M
0.08%
YTD
18.16%
6M
17.43%
1Y
42.14%
3Y*
10.86%
5Y*
1.76%
10Y*
12.70%

YCS

1D
0.17%
1M
4.42%
YTD
7.17%
6M
10.05%
1Y
32.82%
3Y*
19.84%
5Y*
23.54%
10Y*
12.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMOG vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMOG
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF
18.16%33.36%-9.33%1.42%-29.92%-2.75%118.38%38.86%-10.18%22.69%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
7.17%9.04%35.41%28.70%29.09%22.38%-11.18%3.37%-1.49%-6.57%

Correlation

The correlation between SMOG and YCS is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2008

0.10

The correlation between SMOG and YCS shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (1 year) to 0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMOG vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMOG
SMOG Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SMOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMOG Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SMOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMOG Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

YCS
YCS Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMOG vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF (SMOG) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMOGYCSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.07

1.92

+0.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.69

2.44

+0.25

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.35

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.80

3.97

+0.83

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.62

12.40

+1.22

SMOG vs. YCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMOG Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the YCS Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMOG and YCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMOGYCSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07

1.92

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

1.12

-1.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.65

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.07

0.33

-0.26

Drawdowns

SMOG vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMOG drawdown since its inception was -84.39%, which is greater than YCS's maximum drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMOG and YCS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMOGYCSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.39%

-49.56%

-34.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.82%

-8.30%

-0.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.72%

-23.05%

-5.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.86%

-27.32%

-20.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.10%

-27.32%

-23.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.61%

0.00%

-14.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-52.47%

-19.93%

-32.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.10%

2.66%

+0.44%

Volatility

SMOG vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF (SMOG) has a higher volatility of 7.43% compared to ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) at 2.75%. This indicates that SMOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMOGYCSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.43%

2.75%

+4.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.46%

12.32%

+3.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.49%

17.27%

+3.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.12%

21.10%

+4.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.73%

19.01%

+6.72%

SMOG vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMOG has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMOG vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison

SMOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SMOG
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF
1.33%1.57%1.64%1.58%1.32%0.44%0.06%0.00%0.62%1.25%2.12%0.56%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMOG and YCS have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMOG has higher volatility (7.43%) compared to YCS (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMOG dropped -84.39% vs YCS's -49.56%.

On 10-year performance, SMOG leads with 12.70% vs 12.34% for YCS. On fees, SMOG is cheaper at 0.61% per year. On volatility, YCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SMOG has performed better with a 12.70% return vs 12.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SMOG is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.

SMOG has the higher dividend yield at 1.33%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.

SMOG is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. SMOG tracks MVIS Global Low Carbon Energy Index, while YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). They also come from different issuers: VanEck and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for SMOG and 1.00% for YCS.

SMOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMOG and YCS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer