PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMN vs. XTAP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SMN vs. XTAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort Basic Materials (SMN) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF (XTAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SMN vs. XTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SMN
ProShares UltraShort Basic Materials
-18.15%-17.96%7.37%-20.23%-3.03%-28.77%
XTAP
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF
1.66%17.58%14.26%23.46%-14.68%11.87%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMN achieves a -18.15% return, which is significantly lower than XTAP's 1.66% return.


SMN

1D
-2.72%
1M
13.58%
YTD
-18.15%
6M
-20.28%
1Y
-29.84%
3Y*
-13.54%
5Y*
-16.86%
10Y*
-25.54%

XTAP

1D
0.08%
1M
0.65%
YTD
1.66%
6M
4.34%
1Y
16.29%
3Y*
16.22%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SMN vs. XTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMN has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SMN vs. XTAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMN
SMN Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
SMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMN Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
SMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMN Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

XTAP
XTAP Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
XTAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTAP Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
XTAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTAP Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMN vs. XTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Basic Materials (SMN) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF (XTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMNXTAPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.70

1.14

-1.85

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.83

1.76

-2.60

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

1.44

-0.55

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.58

1.43

-2.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.88

9.78

-10.66

SMN vs. XTAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMN Sharpe Ratio is -0.70, which is lower than the XTAP Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMN and XTAP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMNXTAPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.70

1.14

-1.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.54

0.69

-1.22

Correlation

The correlation between SMN and XTAP is -0.66. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

SMN vs. XTAP - Dividend Comparison

SMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.30%, while XTAP has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
SMN
ProShares UltraShort Basic Materials
4.30%4.08%5.02%4.54%0.42%0.00%0.00%0.72%0.06%
XTAP
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

SMN vs. XTAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMN drawdown since its inception was -99.92%, which is greater than XTAP's maximum drawdown of -22.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMN and XTAP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SMNXTAPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.92%

-22.13%

-77.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.71%

-11.83%

-41.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-95.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.90%

0.00%

-99.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-90.46%

-3.57%

-86.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

35.23%

1.73%

+33.50%

Volatility

SMN vs. XTAP - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraShort Basic Materials (SMN) has a higher volatility of 12.67% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF (XTAP) at 0.77%. This indicates that SMN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XTAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SMNXTAPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.67%

0.77%

+11.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.22%

2.52%

+22.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.54%

14.33%

+28.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.57%

14.60%

+24.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.87%

14.60%

+28.27%