SMN vs. PLUL
SMN (ProShares UltraShort Basic Materials) and PLUL (Leverage Shares 2X Long PLUG Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds - SMN tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Basic Materials Index (-200%) while PLUL tracks the Plug Power Inc. (PLUG). Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.18, they often move in opposite directions. SMN charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PLUL.
Performance
SMN vs. PLUL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SMN
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- 6.34%
- 6M
- -9.45%
- YTD
- -19.90%
- 1Y
- -20.05%
- 3Y*
- -12.05%
- 5Y*
- -16.15%
- 10Y*
- -24.12%
- ALL TIME*
- -27.55%
PLUL
- 1D
- 12.71%
- 1M
- -38.92%
- 6M
- -39.94%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
SMN vs. PLUL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SMN ProShares UltraShort Basic Materials | -8.40% |
PLUL Leverage Shares 2X Long PLUG Daily ETF | -38.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMN and PLUL is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026 | -0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMN vs. PLUL — Risk / Return Rank
SMN
PLUL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SMN vs. PLUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Basic Materials (SMN) and Leverage Shares 2X Long PLUG Daily ETF (PLUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMN | PLUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.52 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.84 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMN vs. PLUL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMN drawdown since its inception was -99.92%, which is greater than PLUL's maximum drawdown of -75.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMN and PLUL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMN | PLUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.92% | -75.83% | -24.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.52% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.05% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -94.78% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.91% | -72.76% | -27.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -90.59% | -33.06% | -57.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.05% | — | — |
Volatility
SMN vs. PLUL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMN | PLUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.80% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.13% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.26% | 177.53% | -142.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.60% | 177.53% | -137.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.84% | 177.53% | -134.69% |
SMN vs. PLUL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMN has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than PLUL's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMN vs. PLUL - Dividend Comparison
SMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, while PLUL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLUL Leverage Shares 2X Long PLUG Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMN ProShares UltraShort Basic Materials | 3.49% | 4.08% | 5.02% | 4.54% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.72% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMN and PLUL have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PLUL is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PLUL is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SMN.
SMN has the higher dividend yield at 3.49%, compared with 0.00% for PLUL.
SMN tracks Dow Jones U.S. Basic Materials Index (-200%), while PLUL tracks Plug Power Inc. (PLUG). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SMN and 0.75% for PLUL.
Find the right allocation for SMN and PLUL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer