SMN vs. IWS
SMN (ProShares UltraShort Basic Materials) and IWS (iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMN is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Basic Materials Index (-200%), while IWS is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell Midcap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SMN returned -24.60%/yr vs 9.96%/yr for IWS. At a correlation of -0.82, they often move in opposite directions. SMN charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for IWS.
Performance
SMN vs. IWS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMN achieves a -20.64% return, which is significantly lower than IWS's 13.38% return. Over the past 10 years, SMN has underperformed IWS with an annualized return of -24.60%, while IWS has yielded a comparatively higher 9.96% annualized return.
SMN
- 1D
- 3.92%
- 1M
- 7.41%
- YTD
- -20.64%
- 6M
- -25.54%
- 1Y
- -26.57%
- 3Y*
- -15.70%
- 5Y*
- -13.64%
- 10Y*
- -24.60%
IWS
- 1D
- -1.87%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- YTD
- 13.38%
- 6M
- 13.09%
- 1Y
- 25.77%
- 3Y*
- 16.56%
- 5Y*
- 8.05%
- 10Y*
- 9.96%
SMN vs. IWS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMN ProShares UltraShort Basic Materials | -20.64% | -17.96% | 7.37% | -20.23% | -3.03% | -45.83% | -55.75% | -33.63% | 32.74% | -38.03% |
IWS iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF | 13.38% | 10.82% | 12.91% | 12.52% | -12.29% | 28.10% | 4.83% | 26.73% | -12.43% | 13.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMN and IWS is -0.78, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.83 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2007 | -0.82 |
The correlation between SMN and IWS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.83 to -0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMN vs. IWS — Risk / Return Rank
SMN
IWS
SMN vs. IWS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Basic Materials (SMN) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMN | IWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.34 | -0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.69 | 3.44 | -4.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.24 | 12.94 | -14.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMN | IWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.78 | 1.95 | -2.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.35 | 0.47 | -0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.57 | 0.52 | -1.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.53 | 0.42 | -0.95 |
Drawdowns
SMN vs. IWS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMN drawdown since its inception was -99.92%, which is greater than IWS's maximum drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMN and IWS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMN | IWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.92% | -62.40% | -37.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.52% | -7.53% | -30.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.71% | -20.57% | -33.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.05% | -21.23% | -44.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -95.39% | -43.83% | -51.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.91% | -1.87% | -98.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -90.55% | -8.02% | -82.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.45% | 2.00% | +19.45% |
Volatility
SMN vs. IWS - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort Basic Materials (SMN) has a higher volatility of 10.97% compared to iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) at 3.73%. This indicates that SMN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMN | IWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.97% | 3.73% | +7.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.86% | 9.74% | +17.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.06% | 13.30% | +20.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.57% | 17.32% | +22.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.91% | 19.36% | +23.55% |
SMN vs. IWS - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMN has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than IWS's 0.23% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMN vs. IWS - Dividend Comparison
SMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, more than IWS's 1.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWS iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF | 1.36% | 1.53% | 1.50% | 1.76% | 1.93% | 1.39% | 1.87% | 1.97% | 2.53% | 1.96% | 2.10% | 2.14% |
SMN ProShares UltraShort Basic Materials | 4.43% | 4.08% | 5.02% | 4.54% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.72% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMN and IWS have a correlation of -0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMN has higher volatility (10.97%) compared to IWS (3.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMN dropped -99.92% vs IWS's -62.40%.
On 10-year performance, IWS leads with 9.96% vs -24.60% for SMN. On fees, IWS is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, IWS has been the lower-risk option at 3.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IWS has performed better with a 9.96% return vs -24.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IWS is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SMN.
SMN has the higher dividend yield at 4.43%, compared with 1.36% for IWS.
SMN is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while IWS is Mid Cap Value Equities. SMN tracks Dow Jones U.S. Basic Materials Index (-200%), while IWS tracks Russell Midcap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SMN and 0.23% for IWS.
IWS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs -0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMN and IWS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer