SMMV vs. FLQS
SMMV (iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF) and FLQS (Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds - SMMV tracks the MSCI USA Small Cap Minimum Volatility (USD) Index while FLQS tracks the LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SMMV returned 4.87%/yr vs 5.27%/yr for FLQS. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SMMV charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for FLQS.
Performance
SMMV vs. FLQS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMMV achieves a 2.04% return, which is significantly lower than FLQS's 6.14% return.
SMMV
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -1.47%
- YTD
- 2.04%
- 6M
- 2.90%
- 1Y
- 6.20%
- 3Y*
- 10.82%
- 5Y*
- 4.87%
- 10Y*
- —
FLQS
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- 6.14%
- 6M
- 5.99%
- 1Y
- 13.84%
- 3Y*
- 11.59%
- 5Y*
- 5.27%
- 10Y*
- —
SMMV vs. FLQS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMMV iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF | 2.04% | 6.42% | 18.29% | 5.63% | -10.00% | 16.64% | -2.88% | 24.21% | 1.15% | 7.24% |
FLQS Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF | 6.14% | 5.04% | 8.34% | 21.28% | -16.88% | 26.58% | 10.51% | 18.34% | -5.86% | 7.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMMV and FLQS is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2017 | 0.83 |
The correlation between SMMV and FLQS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
SMMV vs. FLQS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SMMV
FLQS
Healthcare
Industrials
Real Estate
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Energy
Basic Materials
Healthcare
SMMV
FLQS
Industrials
SMMV
FLQS
Real Estate
SMMV
FLQS
Technology
SMMV
FLQS
Financial Services
SMMV
FLQS
Consumer Defensive
SMMV
FLQS
Utilities
SMMV
FLQS
Consumer Cyclical
SMMV
FLQS
Communication Services
SMMV
FLQS
Energy
SMMV
FLQS
Basic Materials
SMMV
FLQS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMMV vs. FLQS — Risk / Return Rank
SMMV
FLQS
SMMV vs. FLQS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF (SMMV) and Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (FLQS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMMV | FLQS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.17 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.89 | 1.54 | -0.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.82 | 4.55 | -1.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMMV | FLQS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 | 0.91 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.28 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.38 | +0.14 |
Drawdowns
SMMV vs. FLQS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMMV drawdown since its inception was -38.77%, smaller than the maximum FLQS drawdown of -42.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMMV and FLQS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMMV | FLQS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.77% | -42.16% | +3.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.02% | -9.00% | +1.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.68% | -23.12% | +9.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.00% | -28.05% | +10.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.44% | -1.33% | -3.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.10% | -8.02% | +2.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.20% | 3.05% | -0.85% |
Volatility
SMMV vs. FLQS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF (SMMV) is 2.27%, while Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (FLQS) has a volatility of 4.09%. This indicates that SMMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLQS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMMV | FLQS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.27% | 4.09% | -1.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.30% | 10.26% | -3.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.73% | 15.22% | -5.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.50% | 19.24% | -5.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.69% | 21.68% | -5.99% |
SMMV vs. FLQS - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMMV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FLQS's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMMV vs. FLQS - Dividend Comparison
SMMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, more than FLQS's 1.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLQS Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF | 1.35% | 1.16% | 1.29% | 1.75% | 1.40% | 0.95% | 1.20% | 1.41% | 1.27% | 1.02% | 0.00% |
SMMV iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF | 1.75% | 1.77% | 1.76% | 2.30% | 1.67% | 1.08% | 1.39% | 1.64% | 1.72% | 1.63% | 0.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMMV and FLQS have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLQS has higher volatility (4.09%) compared to SMMV (2.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMMV dropped -38.77% vs FLQS's -42.16%.
On 5-year performance, FLQS leads with 5.27% vs 4.87% for SMMV. On fees, SMMV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, SMMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FLQS has performed better with a 5.27% return vs 4.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMMV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FLQS.
SMMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 1.35% for FLQS.
SMMV tracks MSCI USA Small Cap Minimum Volatility (USD) Index, while FLQS tracks LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SMMV and 0.35% for FLQS.
FLQS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.91 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMMV and FLQS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer