PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMMV vs. FLQS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMMV vs. FLQS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF (SMMV) and Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (FLQS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMMV achieves a 2.04% return, which is significantly lower than FLQS's 6.14% return.


SMMV

1D
-0.27%
1M
-1.47%
YTD
2.04%
6M
2.90%
1Y
6.20%
3Y*
10.82%
5Y*
4.87%
10Y*

FLQS

1D
-0.81%
1M
0.12%
YTD
6.14%
6M
5.99%
1Y
13.84%
3Y*
11.59%
5Y*
5.27%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMMV vs. FLQS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMMV
iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF
2.04%6.42%18.29%5.63%-10.00%16.64%-2.88%24.21%1.15%7.24%
FLQS
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
6.14%5.04%8.34%21.28%-16.88%26.58%10.51%18.34%-5.86%7.41%

Correlation

The correlation between SMMV and FLQS is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2017

0.83

The correlation between SMMV and FLQS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

SMMV vs. FLQS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SMMV
FLQS

Healthcare

17.1%
9.6%

Industrials

13.8%
16.3%

Real Estate

13.4%
6.7%

Technology

10.9%
17.1%

Financial Services

10.9%
12.6%

Consumer Defensive

8.1%
7.8%

Utilities

7.7%
5.8%

Consumer Cyclical

5.6%
15.6%

Communication Services

5.4%
1.9%

Energy

4.5%
4.6%

Basic Materials

2.0%
2.1%

Healthcare

SMMV
17.1%
FLQS
9.6%

Industrials

SMMV
13.8%
FLQS
16.3%

Real Estate

SMMV
13.4%
FLQS
6.7%

Technology

SMMV
10.9%
FLQS
17.1%

Financial Services

SMMV
10.9%
FLQS
12.6%

Consumer Defensive

SMMV
8.1%
FLQS
7.8%

Utilities

SMMV
7.7%
FLQS
5.8%

Consumer Cyclical

SMMV
5.6%
FLQS
15.6%

Communication Services

SMMV
5.4%
FLQS
1.9%

Energy

SMMV
4.5%
FLQS
4.6%

Basic Materials

SMMV
2.0%
FLQS
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMMV vs. FLQS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMMV
SMMV Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
SMMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMMV Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
SMMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMMV Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

FLQS
FLQS Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
FLQS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLQS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLQS Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
FLQS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLQS Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMMV vs. FLQS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF (SMMV) and Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (FLQS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMMVFLQSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.17

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.89

1.54

-0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.82

4.55

-1.72

SMMV vs. FLQS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMMV Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is comparable to the FLQS Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMMV and FLQS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMMVFLQSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

0.91

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.28

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.38

+0.14

Drawdowns

SMMV vs. FLQS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMMV drawdown since its inception was -38.77%, smaller than the maximum FLQS drawdown of -42.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMMV and FLQS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMMVFLQSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.77%

-42.16%

+3.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.02%

-9.00%

+1.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.68%

-23.12%

+9.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.00%

-28.05%

+10.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.44%

-1.33%

-3.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.10%

-8.02%

+2.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.20%

3.05%

-0.85%

Volatility

SMMV vs. FLQS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF (SMMV) is 2.27%, while Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (FLQS) has a volatility of 4.09%. This indicates that SMMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLQS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMMVFLQSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.27%

4.09%

-1.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.30%

10.26%

-3.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.73%

15.22%

-5.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.50%

19.24%

-5.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.69%

21.68%

-5.99%

SMMV vs. FLQS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMMV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FLQS's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMMV vs. FLQS - Dividend Comparison

SMMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, more than FLQS's 1.35% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FLQS
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
1.35%1.16%1.29%1.75%1.40%0.95%1.20%1.41%1.27%1.02%0.00%
SMMV
iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF
1.75%1.77%1.76%2.30%1.67%1.08%1.39%1.64%1.72%1.63%0.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMMV and FLQS have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLQS has higher volatility (4.09%) compared to SMMV (2.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMMV dropped -38.77% vs FLQS's -42.16%.

On 5-year performance, FLQS leads with 5.27% vs 4.87% for SMMV. On fees, SMMV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, SMMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLQS has performed better with a 5.27% return vs 4.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SMMV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FLQS.

SMMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 1.35% for FLQS.

SMMV tracks MSCI USA Small Cap Minimum Volatility (USD) Index, while FLQS tracks LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SMMV and 0.35% for FLQS.

FLQS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.91 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMMV and FLQS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer