SMMV vs. DUSG
SMMV (iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF) and DUSG (Dimensional U.S. Small Cap Growth ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. SMMV is passively managed, while DUSG is actively managed. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMMV charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for DUSG.
Performance
SMMV vs. DUSG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SMMV
- 1D
- 1.45%
- 1M
- 5.33%
- 6M
- 6.01%
- YTD
- 9.45%
- 1Y
- 14.73%
- 3Y*
- 12.84%
- 5Y*
- 6.69%
- 10Y*
- —
DUSG
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMMV vs. DUSG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SMMV iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF | 5.24% |
DUSG Dimensional U.S. Small Cap Growth ETF | 3.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMMV and DUSG is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2026 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMMV vs. DUSG — Risk / Return Rank
SMMV
DUSG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SMMV vs. DUSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF (SMMV) and Dimensional U.S. Small Cap Growth ETF (DUSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMMV | DUSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.11 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.40 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMMV vs. DUSG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMMV drawdown since its inception was -38.77%, which is greater than DUSG's maximum drawdown of -4.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMMV and DUSG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMMV | DUSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.77% | -4.19% | -34.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.66% | +1.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.06% | -1.14% | -3.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.31% | — | — |
Volatility
SMMV vs. DUSG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMMV | DUSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.24% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.93% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.84% | 14.63% | -4.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.48% | 14.63% | -1.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.64% | 14.63% | +1.01% |
SMMV vs. DUSG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMMV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than DUSG's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMMV vs. DUSG - Dividend Comparison
SMMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, more than DUSG's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DUSG Dimensional U.S. Small Cap Growth ETF | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMMV iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF | 1.65% | 1.77% | 1.76% | 2.30% | 1.67% | 1.08% | 1.39% | 1.64% | 1.72% | 1.63% | 0.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMMV and DUSG have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SMMV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SMMV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for DUSG.
SMMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.65%, compared with 0.14% for DUSG.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Dimensional Fund Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SMMV and 0.32% for DUSG.
Find the right allocation for SMMV and DUSG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer