DUSG vs. FSGS
DUSG (Dimensional U.S. Small Cap Growth ETF) and FSGS (First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. DUSG is actively managed, while FSGS is passively managed. Their 0.74 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. DUSG charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FSGS.
Performance
DUSG vs. FSGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DUSG
- 1D
- 1.93%
- 1M
- 3.13%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
FSGS
- 1D
- 2.07%
- 1M
- 4.77%
- 6M
- 10.03%
- YTD
- 10.71%
- 1Y
- 10.71%
- 3Y*
- 7.80%
- 5Y*
- 5.01%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.80%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $522.27K | $298.89K | $124.88K | |
| $36.35K | $33.59K | $77.26K |
DUSG vs. FSGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DUSG Dimensional U.S. Small Cap Growth ETF | 7.14% |
FSGS First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF | 8.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between DUSG and FSGS is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2026 | 0.74 |
DUSG vs. FSGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DUSG
FSGS
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
-
Real Estate
Industrials
DUSG
FSGS
Technology
DUSG
FSGS
Consumer Cyclical
DUSG
FSGS
Healthcare
DUSG
FSGS
Financial Services
DUSG
FSGS
Basic Materials
DUSG
FSGS
Consumer Defensive
DUSG
FSGS
Energy
DUSG
FSGS
Communication Services
DUSG
FSGS
Utilities
DUSG
FSGS
-
Real Estate
DUSG
FSGS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DUSG vs. FSGS — Risk / Return Rank
DUSG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FSGS
DUSG vs. FSGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional U.S. Small Cap Growth ETF (DUSG) and First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF (FSGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DUSG | FSGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.13 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.95 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2.66 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DUSG vs. FSGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DUSG drawdown since its inception was -4.19%, smaller than the maximum FSGS drawdown of -43.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUSG and FSGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DUSG | FSGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.19% | -43.26% | +39.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.08% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.31% | -7.92% | +6.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.03% | — |
Volatility
DUSG vs. FSGS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DUSG | FSGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.53% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.21% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.82% | 15.28% | -0.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.82% | 20.00% | -5.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.82% | 22.68% | -7.86% |
DUSG vs. FSGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
DUSG has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than FSGS's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
DUSG vs. FSGS - Dividend Comparison
DUSG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, more than FSGS's 0.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DUSG Dimensional U.S. Small Cap Growth ETF | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FSGS First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF | 0.03% | 0.00% | 2.71% | 2.29% | 1.95% | 1.35% | 1.32% | 1.77% | 2.13% | 1.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DUSG and FSGS have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DUSG is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DUSG is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FSGS.
DUSG has the higher dividend yield at 0.14%, compared with 0.03% for FSGS.
They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for DUSG and 0.60% for FSGS.
Find the right allocation for DUSG and FSGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer