SMMD vs. YCS
SMMD (iShares Russell 2500 ETF) and YCS (ProShares UltraShort Yen) are both exchange-traded funds - SMMD is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 2500 Index, while YCS is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SMMD returned 7.71%/yr vs 23.52%/yr for YCS. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMMD charges 0.15%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for YCS.
Performance
SMMD vs. YCS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMMD achieves a 20.07% return, which is significantly higher than YCS's 9.63% return.
SMMD
- 1D
- -1.43%
- 1M
- 3.19%
- YTD
- 20.07%
- 6M
- 17.51%
- 1Y
- 36.34%
- 3Y*
- 19.02%
- 5Y*
- 7.71%
- 10Y*
- —
YCS
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 3.57%
- YTD
- 9.63%
- 6M
- 10.44%
- 1Y
- 31.27%
- 3Y*
- 18.37%
- 5Y*
- 23.52%
- 10Y*
- 13.62%
SMMD vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMMD iShares Russell 2500 ETF | 20.07% | 11.72% | 11.87% | 17.71% | -18.53% | 18.30% | 19.98% | 28.01% | -10.58% | 11.27% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 9.63% | 9.04% | 35.41% | 28.70% | 29.09% | 22.38% | -11.18% | 3.37% | -1.49% | -0.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMMD and YCS is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2017 | 0.05 |
The correlation between SMMD and YCS shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMMD vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank
SMMD
YCS
SMMD vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMMD | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.34 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.78 | 3.78 | 0.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.32 | 11.93 | +2.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMMD vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMMD drawdown since its inception was -41.06%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMMD and YCS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMMD | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.06% | -49.56% | +8.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.66% | -8.30% | -1.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.50% | -23.05% | -2.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.26% | -27.32% | -0.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.43% | -0.14% | -1.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.33% | -19.87% | +11.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.54% | 2.65% | -0.11% |
Volatility
SMMD vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison
iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD) has a higher volatility of 5.96% compared to ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) at 2.25%. This indicates that SMMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMMD | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.96% | 2.25% | +3.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.39% | 12.19% | +1.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.77% | 16.93% | +0.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.91% | 21.10% | -0.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.37% | 18.82% | +3.55% |
SMMD vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMMD has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMMD vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison
SMMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMMD iShares Russell 2500 ETF | 1.07% | 1.28% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.79% | 1.12% | 1.31% | 1.50% | 2.45% | 0.68% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMMD and YCS have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMMD has higher volatility (5.96%) compared to YCS (2.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMMD dropped -41.06% vs YCS's -49.56%.
On 5-year performance, YCS leads with 23.52% vs 7.71% for SMMD. On fees, SMMD is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, YCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, YCS has performed better with a 23.52% return vs 7.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMMD is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.
SMMD has the higher dividend yield at 1.07%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.
SMMD is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. SMMD tracks Russell 2500 Index, while YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SMMD and 1.00% for YCS.
SMMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMMD and YCS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer