SMMD vs. FSMD

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

SMMD (iShares Russell 2500 ETF) and FSMD (Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMMD is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 2500 Index, while FSMD is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SMMD returned 8.99%/yr vs 10.71%/yr for FSMD. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.

Performance

SMMD vs. FSMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD) and Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMMD achieves a 20.90% return, which is significantly higher than FSMD's 16.55% return.

SMMD

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: 0.58%
• 6M: 12.63%
• YTD: 20.90%
• 1Y: 32.16%
• 3Y*: 16.58%
• 5Y*: 8.99%
• 10Y*: —

FSMD

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.39%
• 6M: 10.83%
• YTD: 16.55%
• 1Y: 24.14%
• 3Y*: 15.93%
• 5Y*: 10.71%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMMD vs. FSMD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
SMMD iShares Russell 2500 ETF	20.90%	11.72%	11.87%	17.71%	-18.53%	18.30%	19.98%	9.08%
FSMD Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF	16.55%	8.70%	15.18%	17.37%	-11.15%	26.40%	8.94%	8.81%

Correlation

The correlation between SMMD and FSMD is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2019	0.96

The correlation between SMMD and FSMD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

SMMD vs. FSMD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SMMD	FSMD
Industrials	22.7%	20.1%
Technology	15.8%	20.5%
Financial Services	13.7%	14.8%
Healthcare	13.2%	11.7%
Consumer Cyclical	9.2%	10.6%
Real Estate	7.9%	6.2%
Basic Materials	4.5%	4.0%
Energy	3.7%	4.1%
Consumer Defensive	3.4%	3.1%
Utilities	2.8%	2.1%
Communication Services	2.5%	2.9%

Return for Risk

SMMD vs. FSMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMMD

SMMD Risk / Return Rank: 74
SMMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
SMMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
SMMD Omega Ratio Rank: 66
SMMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
SMMD Martin Ratio Rank: 82

FSMD

FSMD Risk / Return Rank: 62
FSMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
FSMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
FSMD Omega Ratio Rank: 54
FSMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
FSMD Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMMD vs. FSMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD) and Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SMMD	FSMD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.83	1.54	+0.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.62	2.29	+0.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.27	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.34	2.87	+0.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.59	10.07	+2.52

SMMD vs. FSMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMMD Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the FSMD Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMMD and FSMD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SMMD vs. FSMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMMD drawdown since its inception was -41.06%, roughly equal to the maximum FSMD drawdown of -40.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMMD and FSMD.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMMD	FSMD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.06%	-40.67%	-0.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.66%	-8.44%	-1.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.50%	-22.16%	-3.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.26%	-22.16%	-6.10%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.60%	-3.37%	+1.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.28%	-5.93%	-2.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.56%	2.40%	+0.16%

Volatility

SMMD vs. FSMD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD) is 3.87%, while Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) has a volatility of 4.47%. This indicates that SMMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SMMD	FSMD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.87%	4.47%	-0.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.28%	12.31%	+0.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.63%	15.75%	+1.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.88%	18.57%	+2.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.31%	21.36%	+0.95%

SMMD vs. FSMD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SMMD and FSMD have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SMMD vs. FSMD - Dividend Comparison

SMMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than FSMD's 1.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSMD Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF	1.25%	1.33%	1.29%	1.37%	1.54%	1.18%	1.32%	1.37%	0.00%	0.00%
SMMD iShares Russell 2500 ETF	1.06%	1.28%	1.27%	1.44%	1.79%	1.12%	1.31%	1.50%	2.45%	0.68%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMMD and FSMD in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, SMMD and FSMD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SMMD or FSMD?

FSMD has higher volatility (4.47%) compared to SMMD (3.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMMD dropped -41.06% vs FSMD's -40.67%.

Which ETF is better, SMMD or FSMD?

On 5-year performance, FSMD leads with 10.71% vs 8.99% for SMMD. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, SMMD has been the lower-risk option at 3.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SMMD or FSMD?

Over the 5-year period, FSMD has performed better with a 10.71% return vs 8.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SMMD or FSMD?

SMMD and FSMD have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SMMD or FSMD?

FSMD has the higher dividend yield at 1.25%, compared with 1.06% for SMMD.

What is the main difference between SMMD and FSMD?

SMMD is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while FSMD is Small Cap Blend Equities. SMMD tracks Russell 2500 Index, while FSMD tracks Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fidelity.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SMMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.