PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMMD vs. FLQS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMMD vs. FLQS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD) and Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (FLQS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMMD achieves a 18.99% return, which is significantly higher than FLQS's 7.28% return.


SMMD

1D
0.52%
1M
3.44%
YTD
18.99%
6M
17.98%
1Y
36.93%
3Y*
19.07%
5Y*
7.75%
10Y*

FLQS

1D
1.08%
1M
-0.18%
YTD
7.28%
6M
7.44%
1Y
15.49%
3Y*
12.59%
5Y*
5.50%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMMD vs. FLQS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMMD
iShares Russell 2500 ETF
18.99%11.72%11.87%17.71%-18.53%18.30%19.98%28.01%-10.58%10.82%
FLQS
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
7.28%5.04%8.34%21.28%-16.88%26.58%10.51%18.34%-5.86%8.48%

Correlation

The correlation between SMMD and FLQS is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2017

0.89

The correlation between SMMD and FLQS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

SMMD vs. FLQS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SMMD
FLQS

Industrials

21.0%
16.3%

Technology

18.8%
17.1%

Financial Services

13.8%
12.6%

Healthcare

11.8%
9.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.6%
15.6%

Real Estate

6.7%
6.7%

Energy

4.9%
4.6%

Basic Materials

4.4%
2.1%

Consumer Defensive

2.8%
7.8%

Utilities

2.7%
5.8%

Communication Services

2.5%
1.9%

Industrials

SMMD
21.0%
FLQS
16.3%

Technology

SMMD
18.8%
FLQS
17.1%

Financial Services

SMMD
13.8%
FLQS
12.6%

Healthcare

SMMD
11.8%
FLQS
9.6%

Consumer Cyclical

SMMD
10.6%
FLQS
15.6%

Real Estate

SMMD
6.7%
FLQS
6.7%

Energy

SMMD
4.9%
FLQS
4.6%

Basic Materials

SMMD
4.4%
FLQS
2.1%

Consumer Defensive

SMMD
2.8%
FLQS
7.8%

Utilities

SMMD
2.7%
FLQS
5.8%

Communication Services

SMMD
2.5%
FLQS
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMMD vs. FLQS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMMD
SMMD Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SMMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMMD Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
SMMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMMD Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

FLQS
FLQS Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
FLQS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLQS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLQS Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
FLQS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLQS Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMMD vs. FLQS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD) and Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (FLQS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMMDFLQSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.19

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.84

1.73

+2.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.65

5.09

+9.56

SMMD vs. FLQS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMMD Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is higher than the FLQS Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMMD and FLQS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMMDFLQSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16

1.02

+1.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.29

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.38

+0.12

Drawdowns

SMMD vs. FLQS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMMD drawdown since its inception was -41.06%, roughly equal to the maximum FLQS drawdown of -42.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMMD and FLQS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMMDFLQSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.06%

-42.16%

+1.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.66%

-9.00%

-0.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.50%

-23.12%

-2.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.26%

-28.05%

-0.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-0.27%

+0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.37%

-8.01%

-0.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.53%

3.05%

-0.52%

Volatility

SMMD vs. FLQS - Volatility Comparison

iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD) has a higher volatility of 5.01% compared to Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (FLQS) at 3.99%. This indicates that SMMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLQS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMMDFLQSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.01%

3.99%

+1.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.58%

10.31%

+2.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.16%

15.23%

+1.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.82%

19.25%

+1.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.36%

21.68%

+0.68%

SMMD vs. FLQS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMMD has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FLQS's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMMD vs. FLQS - Dividend Comparison

SMMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than FLQS's 1.34% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLQS
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
1.34%1.16%1.29%1.75%1.40%0.95%1.20%1.41%1.27%1.02%
SMMD
iShares Russell 2500 ETF
1.05%1.28%1.27%1.44%1.79%1.12%1.31%1.50%2.45%0.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMMD and FLQS have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMMD has higher volatility (5.01%) compared to FLQS (3.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMMD dropped -41.06% vs FLQS's -42.16%.

On 5-year performance, SMMD leads with 7.75% vs 5.50% for FLQS. On fees, SMMD is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FLQS has been the lower-risk option at 3.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SMMD has performed better with a 7.75% return vs 5.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SMMD is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FLQS.

FLQS has the higher dividend yield at 1.34%, compared with 1.05% for SMMD.

SMMD tracks Russell 2500 Index, while FLQS tracks LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SMMD and 0.35% for FLQS.

SMMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMMD and FLQS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer