PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMLV vs. SHV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMLV vs. SHV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) and iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMLV achieves a 14.81% return, which is significantly higher than SHV's 1.47% return. Over the past 10 years, SMLV has outperformed SHV with an annualized return of 10.25%, while SHV has yielded a comparatively lower 2.23% annualized return.


SMLV

1D
0.20%
1M
1.40%
YTD
14.81%
6M
15.50%
1Y
23.44%
3Y*
15.62%
5Y*
8.02%
10Y*
10.25%

SHV

1D
0.01%
1M
0.26%
YTD
1.47%
6M
1.74%
1Y
3.90%
3Y*
4.63%
5Y*
3.33%
10Y*
2.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMLV vs. SHV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMLV
SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
14.81%5.66%16.77%7.52%-7.69%27.67%-1.55%24.10%-6.62%5.68%
SHV
iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF
1.47%4.21%5.12%5.04%0.94%-0.10%0.81%2.36%1.72%0.67%

Correlation

The correlation between SMLV and SHV is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2013

-0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMLV vs. SHV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMLV
SMLV Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
SMLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMLV Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SMLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMLV Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

SHV
SHV Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
SHV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHV Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHV Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
SHV Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHV Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMLV vs. SHV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) and iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMLVSHVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-17.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-147.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

53.77

-52.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.21

431.38

-428.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.78

2,419.80

-2,411.02

SMLV vs. SHV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMLV Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is lower than the SHV Sharpe Ratio of 19.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMLV and SHV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMLVSHVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50

19.49

-17.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

11.62

-11.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

8.09

-7.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

4.50

-3.95

Drawdowns

SMLV vs. SHV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMLV drawdown since its inception was -42.45%, which is greater than SHV's maximum drawdown of -0.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMLV and SHV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMLVSHVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.45%

-0.45%

-42.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.34%

-0.01%

-7.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.40%

-0.03%

-20.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.40%

-0.39%

-20.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.45%

-0.45%

-42.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.45%

-0.03%

-5.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

0.00%

+2.68%

Volatility

SMLV vs. SHV - Volatility Comparison

SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) has a higher volatility of 4.09% compared to iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHV) at 0.05%. This indicates that SMLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMLVSHVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.09%

0.05%

+4.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.92%

0.12%

+9.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.73%

0.20%

+15.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.29%

0.29%

+18.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.96%

0.28%

+20.68%

SMLV vs. SHV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMLV has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than SHV's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SMLV vs. SHV - Dividend Comparison

SMLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, less than SHV's 3.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SHV
iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF
3.83%4.09%5.02%4.73%1.39%0.00%0.74%2.19%1.66%0.72%0.34%0.03%
SMLV
SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
2.31%2.74%2.68%2.68%2.40%2.12%2.47%2.62%3.15%7.92%3.04%2.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMLV and SHV have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMLV has higher volatility (4.09%) compared to SHV (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMLV dropped -42.45% vs SHV's -0.45%.

On 10-year performance, SMLV leads with 10.25% vs 2.23% for SHV. On fees, SMLV is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, SHV has been the lower-risk option at 0.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SMLV has performed better with a 10.25% return vs 2.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SMLV is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SHV.

SHV has the higher dividend yield at 3.83%, compared with 2.31% for SMLV.

SMLV is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while SHV is Government Bonds. SMLV tracks SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index, while SHV tracks ICE Short US Treasury Securities Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SMLV and 0.15% for SHV.

SHV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.49 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMLV and SHV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer