PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMLV vs. LVHI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMLV vs. LVHI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) and Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMLV achieves a 14.58% return, which is significantly higher than LVHI's 11.03% return.


SMLV

1D
0.00%
1M
1.34%
YTD
14.58%
6M
15.02%
1Y
24.56%
3Y*
15.84%
5Y*
8.07%
10Y*
10.17%

LVHI

1D
-0.94%
1M
-1.04%
YTD
11.03%
6M
13.12%
1Y
29.65%
3Y*
20.66%
5Y*
15.66%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMLV vs. LVHI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMLV
SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
14.58%5.66%16.77%7.52%-7.69%27.67%-1.55%24.10%-6.62%5.68%
LVHI
Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
11.03%27.12%14.81%17.45%3.84%18.19%-8.76%18.35%-5.22%12.26%

Correlation

The correlation between SMLV and LVHI is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2016

0.53

The correlation between SMLV and LVHI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

SMLV vs. LVHI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SMLV
LVHI

Financial Services

30.5%
23.6%

Industrials

14.3%
13.4%

Real Estate

12.2%
1.9%

Technology

11.2%
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

8.7%
5.3%

Healthcare

8.7%
7.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.3%
8.7%

Basic Materials

3.2%
6.1%

Utilities

2.9%
10.4%

Communication Services

2.2%
5.8%

Energy

1.8%
17.4%

Financial Services

SMLV
30.5%
LVHI
23.6%

Industrials

SMLV
14.3%
LVHI
13.4%

Real Estate

SMLV
12.2%
LVHI
1.9%

Technology

SMLV
11.2%
LVHI
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

SMLV
8.7%
LVHI
5.3%

Healthcare

SMLV
8.7%
LVHI
7.4%

Consumer Defensive

SMLV
4.3%
LVHI
8.7%

Basic Materials

SMLV
3.2%
LVHI
6.1%

Utilities

SMLV
2.9%
LVHI
10.4%

Communication Services

SMLV
2.2%
LVHI
5.8%

Energy

SMLV
1.8%
LVHI
17.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMLV vs. LVHI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMLV
SMLV Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
SMLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMLV Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
SMLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMLV Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

LVHI
LVHI Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
LVHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVHI Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
LVHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVHI Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMLV vs. LVHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) and Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMLVLVHIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.59

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.36

4.90

-1.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.20

20.31

-11.11

SMLV vs. LVHI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMLV Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is lower than the LVHI Sharpe Ratio of 3.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMLV and LVHI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMLVLVHIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.57

3.14

-1.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

1.42

-0.98

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.81

-0.26

Drawdowns

SMLV vs. LVHI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMLV drawdown since its inception was -42.45%, which is greater than LVHI's maximum drawdown of -32.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMLV and LVHI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMLVLVHIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.45%

-32.31%

-10.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.34%

-6.08%

-1.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.40%

-11.99%

-8.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.40%

-11.99%

-8.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.16%

+2.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.45%

-3.52%

-1.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

1.46%

+1.22%

Volatility

SMLV vs. LVHI - Volatility Comparison

SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) has a higher volatility of 4.09% compared to Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) at 2.91%. This indicates that SMLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMLVLVHIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.09%

2.91%

+1.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.92%

7.57%

+2.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.73%

9.49%

+6.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.28%

11.06%

+7.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.95%

13.76%

+7.19%

SMLV vs. LVHI - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMLV has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than LVHI's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMLV vs. LVHI - Dividend Comparison

SMLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, less than LVHI's 4.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LVHI
Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
4.80%4.92%3.98%8.12%7.74%4.13%3.97%6.67%10.67%3.38%2.02%0.00%
SMLV
SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
2.31%2.74%2.68%2.68%2.40%2.12%2.47%2.62%3.15%7.92%3.04%2.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMLV and LVHI have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMLV has higher volatility (4.09%) compared to LVHI (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMLV dropped -42.45% vs LVHI's -32.31%.

On 5-year performance, LVHI leads with 15.66% vs 8.07% for SMLV. On fees, SMLV is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, LVHI has been the lower-risk option at 2.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, LVHI has performed better with a 15.66% return vs 8.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SMLV is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for LVHI.

LVHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.80%, compared with 2.31% for SMLV.

SMLV tracks SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index, while LVHI tracks Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SMLV and 0.40% for LVHI.

LVHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.14 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMLV and LVHI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer