SMLV vs. GLD
SMLV (SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF) and GLD (SPDR Gold Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - SMLV is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index, while GLD is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SMLV returned 10.05%/yr vs 13.12%/yr for GLD. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. SMLV charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for GLD.
Performance
SMLV vs. GLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMLV achieves a 12.88% return, which is significantly higher than GLD's 2.92% return. Over the past 10 years, SMLV has underperformed GLD with an annualized return of 10.05%, while GLD has yielded a comparatively higher 13.12% annualized return.
SMLV
- 1D
- -1.48%
- 1M
- 1.39%
- YTD
- 12.88%
- 6M
- 12.84%
- 1Y
- 21.90%
- 3Y*
- 15.66%
- 5Y*
- 7.75%
- 10Y*
- 10.05%
GLD
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 2.92%
- 6M
- 5.43%
- 1Y
- 32.04%
- 3Y*
- 31.09%
- 5Y*
- 18.15%
- 10Y*
- 13.12%
SMLV vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMLV SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF | 12.88% | 5.66% | 16.77% | 7.52% | -7.69% | 27.67% | -1.55% | 24.10% | -6.62% | 5.68% |
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 2.92% | 63.68% | 26.66% | 12.69% | -0.77% | -4.15% | 24.81% | 17.86% | -1.94% | 12.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMLV and GLD is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2013 | -0.01 |
The correlation between SMLV and GLD shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (all time) to 0.11 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SMLV vs. GLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SMLV
GLD
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
SMLV
GLD
-
Industrials
SMLV
GLD
-
Real Estate
SMLV
GLD
-
Technology
SMLV
GLD
-
Consumer Cyclical
SMLV
GLD
-
Healthcare
SMLV
GLD
-
Consumer Defensive
SMLV
GLD
-
Basic Materials
SMLV
GLD
Utilities
SMLV
GLD
-
Communication Services
SMLV
GLD
-
Energy
SMLV
GLD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMLV vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank
SMLV
GLD
SMLV vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMLV | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.24 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.00 | 1.68 | +1.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.20 | 4.15 | +4.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMLV | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.40 | 1.21 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 1.01 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.83 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.60 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
SMLV vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMLV drawdown since its inception was -42.45%, smaller than the maximum GLD drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMLV and GLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMLV | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.45% | -45.56% | +3.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.34% | -19.21% | +11.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.40% | -19.21% | -1.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.40% | -21.03% | +0.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.45% | -22.00% | -20.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.48% | -17.75% | +16.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.46% | -16.16% | +10.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.68% | 7.73% | -5.05% |
Volatility
SMLV vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) is 3.98%, while SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) has a volatility of 5.51%. This indicates that SMLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMLV | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.98% | 5.51% | -1.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.88% | 23.16% | -13.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.73% | 26.61% | -10.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.28% | 18.00% | +0.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.95% | 15.95% | +5.00% |
SMLV vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMLV has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMLV vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison
SMLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, while GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMLV SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF | 2.35% | 2.74% | 2.68% | 2.68% | 2.40% | 2.12% | 2.47% | 2.62% | 3.15% | 7.92% | 3.04% | 2.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMLV and GLD have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLD has higher volatility (5.51%) compared to SMLV (3.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMLV dropped -42.45% vs GLD's -45.56%.
On 10-year performance, GLD leads with 13.12% vs 10.05% for SMLV. On fees, SMLV is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, SMLV has been the lower-risk option at 3.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GLD has performed better with a 13.12% return vs 10.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMLV is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GLD.
SMLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.35%, compared with 0.00% for GLD.
SMLV is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while GLD is Gold. SMLV tracks SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index, while GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SMLV and 0.40% for GLD.
SMLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMLV and GLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer