SMLV vs. BSVO
SMLV (SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF) and BSVO (EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMLV is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index, while BSVO is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Bridgeway. SMLV is passively managed, while BSVO is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, SMLV returned 16.97%/yr vs 19.99%/yr for BSVO. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SMLV charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for BSVO.
Performance
SMLV vs. BSVO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMLV achieves a 14.58% return, which is significantly lower than BSVO's 20.22% return.
SMLV
- 1D
- 1.51%
- 1M
- 1.85%
- YTD
- 14.58%
- 6M
- 14.63%
- 1Y
- 24.52%
- 3Y*
- 16.97%
- 5Y*
- 8.07%
- 10Y*
- 10.15%
BSVO
- 1D
- 1.80%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- YTD
- 20.22%
- 6M
- 19.77%
- 1Y
- 45.25%
- 3Y*
- 19.99%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMLV vs. BSVO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SMLV SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF | 14.58% | 5.66% | 16.77% | 12.02% |
BSVO EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF | 20.22% | 9.21% | 4.68% | 22.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMLV and BSVO is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2023 | 0.92 |
The correlation between SMLV and BSVO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
SMLV vs. BSVO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SMLV
BSVO
Financial Services
Industrials
Real Estate
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
-
Communication Services
Energy
Financial Services
SMLV
BSVO
Industrials
SMLV
BSVO
Real Estate
SMLV
BSVO
Technology
SMLV
BSVO
Consumer Cyclical
SMLV
BSVO
Healthcare
SMLV
BSVO
Consumer Defensive
SMLV
BSVO
Basic Materials
SMLV
BSVO
Utilities
SMLV
BSVO
-
Communication Services
SMLV
BSVO
Energy
SMLV
BSVO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMLV vs. BSVO — Risk / Return Rank
SMLV
BSVO
SMLV vs. BSVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) and EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF (BSVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMLV | BSVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.42 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.35 | 5.47 | -2.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.18 | 15.58 | -6.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMLV | BSVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.57 | 2.41 | -0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.81 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
SMLV vs. BSVO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMLV drawdown since its inception was -42.45%, which is greater than BSVO's maximum drawdown of -28.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMLV and BSVO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMLV | BSVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.45% | -28.67% | -13.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.34% | -8.31% | +0.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.40% | -28.67% | +8.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.45% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.09% | +0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.46% | -5.72% | +0.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.68% | 2.91% | -0.23% |
Volatility
SMLV vs. BSVO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) is 4.12%, while EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF (BSVO) has a volatility of 4.83%. This indicates that SMLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BSVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMLV | BSVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.12% | 4.83% | -0.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.98% | 12.07% | -2.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.75% | 18.88% | -3.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.29% | 21.73% | -3.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.95% | 21.73% | -0.78% |
SMLV vs. BSVO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMLV has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than BSVO's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMLV vs. BSVO - Dividend Comparison
SMLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, more than BSVO's 1.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSVO EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF | 1.26% | 1.52% | 1.61% | 1.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMLV SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF | 2.31% | 2.74% | 2.68% | 2.68% | 2.40% | 2.12% | 2.47% | 2.62% | 3.15% | 7.92% | 3.04% | 2.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, SMLV and BSVO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BSVO has higher volatility (4.83%) compared to SMLV (4.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMLV dropped -42.45% vs BSVO's -28.67%.
On 3-year performance, BSVO leads with 19.99% vs 16.97% for SMLV. On fees, SMLV is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, SMLV has been the lower-risk option at 4.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BSVO has performed better with a 19.99% return vs 16.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMLV is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for BSVO.
SMLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.31%, compared with 1.26% for BSVO.
SMLV is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while BSVO is Small Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Bridgeway. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SMLV and 0.47% for BSVO.
BSVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMLV and BSVO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer