PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMLV vs. BSVO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMLV vs. BSVO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) and EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF (BSVO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMLV achieves a 14.58% return, which is significantly lower than BSVO's 20.22% return.


SMLV

1D
1.51%
1M
1.85%
YTD
14.58%
6M
14.63%
1Y
24.52%
3Y*
16.97%
5Y*
8.07%
10Y*
10.15%

BSVO

1D
1.80%
1M
0.51%
YTD
20.22%
6M
19.77%
1Y
45.25%
3Y*
19.99%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMLV vs. BSVO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SMLV
SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
14.58%5.66%16.77%12.02%
BSVO
EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF
20.22%9.21%4.68%22.38%

Correlation

The correlation between SMLV and BSVO is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2023

0.92

The correlation between SMLV and BSVO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

SMLV vs. BSVO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SMLV
BSVO

Financial Services

30.5%
32.3%

Industrials

14.3%
13.8%

Real Estate

12.2%
0.6%

Technology

11.2%
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

8.7%
14.3%

Healthcare

8.7%
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.3%
4.8%

Basic Materials

3.2%
6.0%

Utilities

2.9%

-

Communication Services

2.2%
3.9%

Energy

1.8%
15.8%

Financial Services

SMLV
30.5%
BSVO
32.3%

Industrials

SMLV
14.3%
BSVO
13.8%

Real Estate

SMLV
12.2%
BSVO
0.6%

Technology

SMLV
11.2%
BSVO
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

SMLV
8.7%
BSVO
14.3%

Healthcare

SMLV
8.7%
BSVO
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

SMLV
4.3%
BSVO
4.8%

Basic Materials

SMLV
3.2%
BSVO
6.0%

Utilities

SMLV
2.9%
BSVO

-

Communication Services

SMLV
2.2%
BSVO
3.9%

Energy

SMLV
1.8%
BSVO
15.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMLV vs. BSVO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMLV
SMLV Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SMLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMLV Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
SMLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMLV Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

BSVO
BSVO Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
BSVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSVO Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
BSVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSVO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMLV vs. BSVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) and EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF (BSVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMLVBSVODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.42

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.35

5.47

-2.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.18

15.58

-6.40

SMLV vs. BSVO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMLV Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is lower than the BSVO Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMLV and BSVO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMLVBSVODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.57

2.41

-0.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.81

-0.26

Drawdowns

SMLV vs. BSVO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMLV drawdown since its inception was -42.45%, which is greater than BSVO's maximum drawdown of -28.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMLV and BSVO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMLVBSVODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.45%

-28.67%

-13.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.34%

-8.31%

+0.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.40%

-28.67%

+8.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.09%

+0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.46%

-5.72%

+0.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

2.91%

-0.23%

Volatility

SMLV vs. BSVO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) is 4.12%, while EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF (BSVO) has a volatility of 4.83%. This indicates that SMLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BSVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMLVBSVODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.12%

4.83%

-0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.98%

12.07%

-2.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.75%

18.88%

-3.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.29%

21.73%

-3.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.95%

21.73%

-0.78%

SMLV vs. BSVO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMLV has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than BSVO's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMLV vs. BSVO - Dividend Comparison

SMLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, more than BSVO's 1.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSVO
EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF
1.26%1.52%1.61%1.43%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SMLV
SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
2.31%2.74%2.68%2.68%2.40%2.12%2.47%2.62%3.15%7.92%3.04%2.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, SMLV and BSVO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BSVO has higher volatility (4.83%) compared to SMLV (4.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMLV dropped -42.45% vs BSVO's -28.67%.

On 3-year performance, BSVO leads with 19.99% vs 16.97% for SMLV. On fees, SMLV is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, SMLV has been the lower-risk option at 4.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, BSVO has performed better with a 19.99% return vs 16.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SMLV is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for BSVO.

SMLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.31%, compared with 1.26% for BSVO.

SMLV is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while BSVO is Small Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Bridgeway. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SMLV and 0.47% for BSVO.

BSVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMLV and BSVO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer