PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMLV vs. BSVO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMLV vs. BSVO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) and EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF (BSVO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMLV achieves a 23.05% return, which is significantly lower than BSVO's 25.63% return.


SMLV

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.72%
6M
16.25%
YTD
23.05%
1Y
34.18%
3Y*
16.71%
5Y*
10.12%
10Y*
10.64%
ALL TIME*
11.09%

BSVO

1D
-0.25%
1M
1.52%
6M
16.16%
YTD
25.63%
1Y
47.58%
3Y*
16.19%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
18.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.33M$3.94M$4.08M
$451.73K$474.34K$539.60K

SMLV vs. BSVO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SMLV
SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
23.05%5.66%16.77%9.64%
BSVO
EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF
25.63%9.21%4.68%21.95%

Correlation

The correlation between SMLV and BSVO is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2023

0.92

The correlation between SMLV and BSVO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

SMLV vs. BSVO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SMLV
BSVO

Financial Services

30.9%
34.7%

Industrials

14.3%
13.0%

Real Estate

11.9%
0.7%

Technology

11.8%
6.1%

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%
15.7%

Healthcare

8.9%
3.7%

Consumer Defensive

3.5%
4.9%

Basic Materials

3.3%
4.8%

Utilities

2.7%

-

Communication Services

2.3%
4.1%

Energy

1.5%
12.5%

Financial Services

SMLV
30.9%
BSVO
34.7%

Industrials

SMLV
14.3%
BSVO
13.0%

Real Estate

SMLV
11.9%
BSVO
0.7%

Technology

SMLV
11.8%
BSVO
6.1%

Consumer Cyclical

SMLV
9.0%
BSVO
15.7%

Healthcare

SMLV
8.9%
BSVO
3.7%

Consumer Defensive

SMLV
3.5%
BSVO
4.9%

Basic Materials

SMLV
3.3%
BSVO
4.8%

Utilities

SMLV
2.7%
BSVO

-

Communication Services

SMLV
2.3%
BSVO
4.1%

Energy

SMLV
1.5%
BSVO
12.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMLV vs. BSVO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SMLV
SMLV Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
SMLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMLV Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
SMLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMLV Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

BSVO
BSVO Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
BSVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSVO Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
BSVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSVO Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SMLV vs. BSVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) and EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF (BSVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SMLVBSVODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.43

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.43

5.31

-0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.96

16.42

-3.46

SMLV vs. BSVO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMLV Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the BSVO Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMLV and BSVO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SMLV vs. BSVO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMLV drawdown since its inception was -42.45%, which is greater than BSVO's maximum drawdown of -28.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMLV and BSVO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMLVBSVODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.45%

-28.67%

-13.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.34%

-8.31%

+0.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.40%

-28.67%

+8.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.22%

-1.45%

+0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.40%

-5.50%

+0.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.50%

2.69%

-0.19%

Volatility

SMLV vs. BSVO - Volatility Comparison

SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) and EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF (BSVO) have volatilities of 3.67% and 3.60%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMLVBSVODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.67%

3.60%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.58%

11.48%

-1.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.38%

18.09%

-2.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.21%

21.41%

-3.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.90%

21.41%

-0.51%

SMLV vs. BSVO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMLV has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than BSVO's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMLV vs. BSVO - Dividend Comparison

SMLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%, more than BSVO's 1.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSVO
EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF
1.21%1.52%1.61%1.43%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SMLV
SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
2.21%2.74%2.68%2.68%2.40%2.12%2.47%2.62%3.15%7.92%3.04%2.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMLV and BSVO have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMLV has higher volatility (3.67%) compared to BSVO (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMLV dropped -42.45% vs BSVO's -28.67%.

On 3-year performance, SMLV leads with 16.71% vs 16.19% for BSVO. On fees, SMLV is cheaper at 0.12% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SMLV has performed better with a 16.71% return vs 16.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SMLV is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for BSVO.

SMLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.21%, compared with 1.21% for BSVO.

SMLV is categorized as Low Volatility, while BSVO is Small Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Bridgeway. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SMLV and 0.47% for BSVO.

BSVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMLV and BSVO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer