BSVO vs. SMH
Compare and contrast key facts about EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF (BSVO) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH).
BSVO and SMH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BSVO is an actively managed fund by Bridgeway. It was launched on Dec 31, 2010. SMH is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2011.
Performance
BSVO vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BSVO vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BSVO EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF | 9.12% | 9.21% | 4.68% | 22.38% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 8.84% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 48.11% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BSVO having a 9.12% return and SMH slightly lower at 8.84%.
BSVO
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -2.48%
- YTD
- 9.12%
- 6M
- 13.72%
- 1Y
- 32.58%
- 3Y*
- 14.90%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMH
- 1D
- 2.24%
- 1M
- -3.55%
- YTD
- 8.84%
- 6M
- 17.83%
- 1Y
- 85.04%
- 3Y*
- 44.53%
- 5Y*
- 26.15%
- 10Y*
- 31.58%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BSVO vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSVO has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BSVO vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
BSVO
SMH
BSVO vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF (BSVO) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSVO | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.38 | 2.32 | -0.94 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.99 | 2.92 | -0.94 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.41 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.19 | 5.39 | -3.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.02 | 19.22 | -11.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSVO | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.38 | 2.32 | -0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.76 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.98 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.28 | +0.40 |
Correlation
The correlation between BSVO and SMH is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
BSVO vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
BSVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, more than SMH's 0.28% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSVO EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF | 1.39% | 1.52% | 1.61% | 1.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.28% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Drawdowns
BSVO vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSVO drawdown since its inception was -28.67%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSVO and SMH.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSVO | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.67% | -84.96% | +56.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.92% | -15.95% | +1.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -45.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.13% | -8.02% | +3.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.99% | -41.35% | +35.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.08% | 4.47% | -0.39% |
Volatility
BSVO vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF (BSVO) is 5.52%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 11.74%. This indicates that BSVO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BSVO | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.52% | 11.74% | -6.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.48% | 24.02% | -10.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.76% | 36.88% | -13.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.02% | 34.68% | -12.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.02% | 32.29% | -10.27% |