BSVO vs. SMH

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

BSVO (EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BSVO is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Bridgeway, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. BSVO is actively managed, while SMH is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BSVO returned 16.92%/yr vs 53.04%/yr for SMH. Their 0.40 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BSVO charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.

Performance

BSVO vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF (BSVO) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSVO achieves a 27.67% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 51.46% return.

BSVO

• 1D: 1.62%
• 1M: 3.17%
• 6M: 16.16%
• YTD: 27.67%
• 1Y: 49.97%
• 3Y*: 16.92%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 18.53%

SMH

• 1D: 0.91%
• 1M: -7.91%
• 6M: 33.70%
• YTD: 51.46%
• 1Y: 92.69%
• 3Y*: 53.04%
• 5Y*: 32.99%
• 10Y*: 33.99%
• ALL TIME*: 11.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BSVO EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF	$3.29M	$4.03M	$4.10M
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	$8.29B	$7.23B	$7.12B

BSVO vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BSVO EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF	27.67%	9.21%	4.68%	21.95%
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	51.46%	49.17%	39.10%	48.01%

Correlation

The correlation between BSVO and SMH is 0.39, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.39
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2023	0.40

BSVO vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BSVO	SMH
Financial Services	34.7%	-
Consumer Cyclical	15.7%	-
Industrials	13.0%	-
Energy	12.5%	-
Technology	6.1%	100.0%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	-
Basic Materials	4.8%	-
Communication Services	4.1%	-
Healthcare	3.7%	-
Real Estate	0.7%	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

BSVO vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BSVO

BSVO Risk / Return Rank: 94
BSVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
BSVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
BSVO Omega Ratio Rank: 93
BSVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
BSVO Martin Ratio Rank: 94

SMH

SMH Risk / Return Rank: 88
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 85
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BSVO vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF (BSVO) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BSVO	SMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.80	2.43	+0.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.95	2.80	+1.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.37	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.04	3.79	+2.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.67	15.18	+3.49

BSVO vs. SMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSVO Sharpe Ratio is 2.80, which is comparable to the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSVO and SMH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BSVO vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSVO drawdown since its inception was -28.67%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSVO and SMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	BSVO	SMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.67%	-84.96%	+56.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.31%	-24.62%	+16.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.67%	-35.74%	+7.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-45.30%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-45.30%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-18.46%	+18.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.49%	-40.89%	+35.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.68%	6.13%	-3.45%

Volatility

BSVO vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF (BSVO) is 3.74%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 14.15%. This indicates that BSVO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BSVO	SMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.74%	14.15%	-10.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.58%	32.94%	-21.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.94%	38.50%	-20.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.41%	36.51%	-15.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.41%	33.33%	-11.92%

BSVO vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSVO has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

BSVO vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

BSVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, more than SMH's 0.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BSVO EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF	1.19%	1.52%	1.61%	1.43%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	0.20%	0.31%	0.44%	0.60%	1.18%	0.51%	0.69%	1.50%	1.88%	1.43%	0.80%	2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BSVO and SMH in my portfolio?

BSVO and SMH have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BSVO or SMH?

SMH has higher volatility (14.15%) compared to BSVO (3.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSVO dropped -28.67% vs SMH's -84.96%.

Which ETF is better, BSVO or SMH?

On 3-year performance, SMH leads with 53.04% vs 16.92% for BSVO. On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, BSVO has been the lower-risk option at 3.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BSVO or SMH?

Over the 3-year period, SMH has performed better with a 53.04% return vs 16.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BSVO or SMH?

SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for BSVO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BSVO or SMH?

BSVO has the higher dividend yield at 1.19%, compared with 0.20% for SMH.

What is the main difference between BSVO and SMH?

BSVO is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while SMH is Semiconductors. They also come from different issuers: Bridgeway and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for BSVO and 0.35% for SMH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BSVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.