SMLF vs. WCEO
SMLF (iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Multifactor ETF) and WCEO (Hypatia Women CEO ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. SMLF is passively managed, while WCEO is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, SMLF returned 19.85%/yr vs 14.56%/yr for WCEO. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SMLF charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for WCEO.
Performance
SMLF vs. WCEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMLF achieves a 14.46% return, which is significantly higher than WCEO's 11.34% return.
SMLF
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 4.07%
- YTD
- 14.46%
- 6M
- 14.20%
- 1Y
- 30.98%
- 3Y*
- 19.85%
- 5Y*
- 10.89%
- 10Y*
- 12.36%
WCEO
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- 2.32%
- YTD
- 11.34%
- 6M
- 12.19%
- 1Y
- 29.95%
- 3Y*
- 14.56%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMLF vs. WCEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SMLF iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Multifactor ETF | 14.46% | 12.30% | 16.33% | 17.13% |
WCEO Hypatia Women CEO ETF | 11.34% | 9.77% | 8.28% | 11.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMLF and WCEO is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 10, 2023 | 0.94 |
The correlation between SMLF and WCEO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
SMLF vs. WCEO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SMLF
WCEO
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Industrials
SMLF
WCEO
Technology
SMLF
WCEO
Financial Services
SMLF
WCEO
Healthcare
SMLF
WCEO
Consumer Cyclical
SMLF
WCEO
Real Estate
SMLF
WCEO
Energy
SMLF
WCEO
Basic Materials
SMLF
WCEO
Consumer Defensive
SMLF
WCEO
Communication Services
SMLF
WCEO
Utilities
SMLF
WCEO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMLF vs. WCEO — Risk / Return Rank
SMLF
WCEO
SMLF vs. WCEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Multifactor ETF (SMLF) and Hypatia Women CEO ETF (WCEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMLF | WCEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.81 | 1.98 | -0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.56 | 2.92 | -0.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.34 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.57 | 4.33 | -0.75 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.27 | 13.47 | -1.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMLF | WCEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.81 | 1.98 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.67 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
SMLF vs. WCEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMLF drawdown since its inception was -41.89%, which is greater than WCEO's maximum drawdown of -25.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMLF and WCEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMLF | WCEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.89% | -25.88% | -16.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.71% | -6.96% | -1.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.28% | -25.88% | -0.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.72% | -0.81% | +0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.60% | -5.52% | -1.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.53% | 2.23% | +0.30% |
Volatility
SMLF vs. WCEO - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Multifactor ETF (SMLF) has a higher volatility of 4.80% compared to Hypatia Women CEO ETF (WCEO) at 3.34%. This indicates that SMLF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WCEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMLF | WCEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.80% | 3.34% | +1.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.31% | 10.22% | +2.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.21% | 15.22% | +1.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.09% | 18.13% | +2.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.78% | 18.13% | +3.65% |
SMLF vs. WCEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMLF has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than WCEO's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMLF vs. WCEO - Dividend Comparison
SMLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, more than WCEO's 0.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMLF iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Multifactor ETF | 1.03% | 1.14% | 1.33% | 1.13% | 1.23% | 1.07% | 1.33% | 1.39% | 1.17% | 0.93% | 0.78% | 0.79% |
WCEO Hypatia Women CEO ETF | 0.58% | 0.64% | 0.88% | 0.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, SMLF and WCEO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SMLF has higher volatility (4.80%) compared to WCEO (3.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMLF dropped -41.89% vs WCEO's -25.88%.
On 3-year performance, SMLF leads with 19.85% vs 14.56% for WCEO. On fees, SMLF is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, WCEO has been the lower-risk option at 3.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SMLF has performed better with a 19.85% return vs 14.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMLF is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for WCEO.
SMLF has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.58% for WCEO.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Hypatia Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for SMLF and 0.85% for WCEO.
WCEO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMLF and WCEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer