PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMIN vs. NORW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMIN vs. NORW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI India Small-Cap ETF (SMIN) and Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMIN achieves a 0.30% return, which is significantly lower than NORW's 17.03% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SMIN having a 9.48% annualized return and NORW not far behind at 9.10%.


SMIN

1D
-1.21%
1M
4.52%
6M
3.12%
YTD
0.30%
1Y
-6.48%
3Y*
8.99%
5Y*
6.72%
10Y*
9.48%

NORW

1D
0.58%
1M
-5.46%
6M
15.05%
YTD
17.03%
1Y
22.30%
3Y*
17.52%
5Y*
6.22%
10Y*
9.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMIN vs. NORW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMIN
iShares MSCI India Small-Cap ETF
0.30%-6.68%16.78%35.41%-14.23%44.43%19.59%-5.21%-25.55%62.36%
NORW
Global X MSCI Norway ETF
17.03%32.59%-2.50%5.03%-12.55%13.65%26.00%14.39%-10.39%24.03%

Correlation

The correlation between SMIN and NORW is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2012

0.37

Over the past year, the correlation between SMIN and NORW has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.37, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SMIN vs. NORW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SMIN
NORW

Industrials

22.4%
14.7%

Financial Services

16.3%
22.9%

Healthcare

14.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

14.0%
0.2%

Basic Materials

10.7%
11.5%

Technology

7.9%
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
12.1%

Real Estate

3.2%
0.4%

Utilities

2.8%
0.6%

Communication Services

1.4%
5.9%

Energy

0.8%
27.3%

Industrials

SMIN
22.4%
NORW
14.7%

Financial Services

SMIN
16.3%
NORW
22.9%

Healthcare

SMIN
14.3%
NORW

-

Consumer Cyclical

SMIN
14.0%
NORW
0.2%

Basic Materials

SMIN
10.7%
NORW
11.5%

Technology

SMIN
7.9%
NORW
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

SMIN
3.9%
NORW
12.1%

Real Estate

SMIN
3.2%
NORW
0.4%

Utilities

SMIN
2.8%
NORW
0.6%

Communication Services

SMIN
1.4%
NORW
5.9%

Energy

SMIN
0.8%
NORW
27.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMIN vs. NORW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMIN
SMIN Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
SMIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMIN Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
SMIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMIN Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

NORW
NORW Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
NORW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NORW Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
NORW Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
NORW Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
NORW Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMIN vs. NORW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI India Small-Cap ETF (SMIN) and Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SMINNORWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.23

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.27

1.55

-1.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.58

5.20

-5.77

SMIN vs. NORW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMIN Sharpe Ratio is -0.34, which is lower than the NORW Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMIN and NORW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SMIN vs. NORW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMIN drawdown since its inception was -60.50%, which is greater than NORW's maximum drawdown of -35.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMIN and NORW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMINNORWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.50%

-35.62%

-24.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.54%

-14.49%

-10.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.58%

-16.06%

-11.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.58%

-32.78%

+5.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.50%

-33.86%

-26.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.28%

-10.63%

-1.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.61%

-10.13%

-4.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.27%

4.30%

+6.97%

Volatility

SMIN vs. NORW - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI India Small-Cap ETF (SMIN) and Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW) have volatilities of 5.69% and 5.67%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMINNORWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.69%

5.67%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.96%

13.89%

+2.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.09%

17.20%

+1.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.96%

21.97%

-3.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.84%

20.53%

+2.31%

SMIN vs. NORW - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMIN has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than NORW's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMIN vs. NORW - Dividend Comparison

SMIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%, less than NORW's 7.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NORW
Global X MSCI Norway ETF
7.69%3.44%6.02%5.27%4.01%1.51%1.13%2.47%3.53%3.64%3.79%2.95%
SMIN
iShares MSCI India Small-Cap ETF
2.01%2.01%6.84%0.41%0.01%1.27%1.06%1.75%1.68%0.89%2.30%0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMIN and NORW have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMIN has higher volatility (5.69%) compared to NORW (5.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMIN dropped -60.50% vs NORW's -35.62%.

On 10-year performance, SMIN leads with 9.48% vs 9.10% for NORW. On fees, NORW is cheaper at 0.50% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SMIN has performed better with a 9.48% return vs 9.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NORW is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for SMIN.

NORW has the higher dividend yield at 7.69%, compared with 2.01% for SMIN.

SMIN is categorized as India Equities, while NORW is Europe Equities. SMIN tracks MSCI India Small Cap Index, while NORW tracks MSCI Norway IMI 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for SMIN and 0.50% for NORW.

NORW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs -0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMIN and NORW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer