SMIG vs. ISCV
Compare and contrast key facts about Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF (SMIG) and iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF (ISCV).
SMIG and ISCV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SMIG is an actively managed fund by Bahl & Gaynor. It was launched on Aug 25, 2021. ISCV is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Small Cap Broad Value Extended Index. It was launched on Jun 28, 2004.
Performance
SMIG vs. ISCV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SMIG vs. ISCV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMIG Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF | 2.39% | 0.78% | 17.63% | 13.62% | -11.83% | 5.51% |
ISCV iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF | 1.87% | 10.38% | 9.31% | 16.55% | -10.58% | 5.66% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMIG achieves a 2.39% return, which is significantly higher than ISCV's 1.87% return.
SMIG
- 1D
- 1.38%
- 1M
- -6.05%
- YTD
- 2.39%
- 6M
- 0.02%
- 1Y
- 4.80%
- 3Y*
- 10.18%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ISCV
- 1D
- 2.45%
- 1M
- -4.55%
- YTD
- 1.87%
- 6M
- 5.45%
- 1Y
- 19.73%
- 3Y*
- 12.43%
- 5Y*
- 6.29%
- 10Y*
- 8.16%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SMIG vs. ISCV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMIG has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCV's 0.06% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SMIG vs. ISCV — Risk / Return Rank
SMIG
ISCV
SMIG vs. ISCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF (SMIG) and iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF (ISCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMIG | ISCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.30 | 0.91 | -0.61 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.54 | 1.41 | -0.86 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.19 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.44 | 1.36 | -0.92 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.44 | 5.42 | -3.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMIG | ISCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 | 0.91 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.30 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.35 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.35 | -0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between SMIG and ISCV is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SMIG vs. ISCV - Dividend Comparison
SMIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, less than ISCV's 2.03% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMIG Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF | 1.85% | 1.82% | 1.75% | 1.91% | 2.00% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ISCV iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF | 2.03% | 2.04% | 2.01% | 2.21% | 2.12% | 1.95% | 2.01% | 2.36% | 2.48% | 1.74% | 2.49% | 2.60% |
Drawdowns
SMIG vs. ISCV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMIG drawdown since its inception was -19.65%, smaller than the maximum ISCV drawdown of -63.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMIG and ISCV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMIG | ISCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.65% | -63.14% | +43.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.92% | -14.70% | +2.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -51.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.01% | -6.18% | -0.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.72% | -9.20% | +2.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.67% | 3.69% | -0.02% |
Volatility
SMIG vs. ISCV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF (SMIG) is 4.02%, while iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF (ISCV) has a volatility of 5.40%. This indicates that SMIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISCV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SMIG | ISCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.02% | 5.40% | -1.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.36% | 12.01% | -3.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.98% | 21.81% | -5.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.33% | 20.96% | -4.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.33% | 23.32% | -6.99% |