PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISCV vs. IJS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISCV vs. IJS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF (ISCV) and iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISCV achieves a 12.15% return, which is significantly lower than IJS's 17.64% return. Over the past 10 years, ISCV has underperformed IJS with an annualized return of 9.06%, while IJS has yielded a comparatively higher 10.51% annualized return.


ISCV

1D
-0.04%
1M
2.51%
YTD
12.15%
6M
10.02%
1Y
29.78%
3Y*
16.32%
5Y*
7.57%
10Y*
9.06%

IJS

1D
-0.23%
1M
3.17%
YTD
17.64%
6M
15.52%
1Y
39.39%
3Y*
15.42%
5Y*
6.48%
10Y*
10.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISCV vs. IJS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ISCV
iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF
12.15%10.38%9.31%16.55%-10.58%29.15%0.86%19.51%-17.39%8.59%
IJS
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF
17.64%6.54%7.33%14.68%-11.34%30.53%2.63%24.11%-12.86%11.35%

Correlation

The correlation between ISCV and IJS is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2004

0.96

The correlation between ISCV and IJS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

ISCV vs. IJS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ISCV
IJS

Financial Services

22.4%
19.4%

Consumer Cyclical

15.6%
15.4%

Industrials

12.7%
11.6%

Real Estate

11.5%
8.6%

Healthcare

8.7%
7.3%

Technology

8.1%
13.4%

Energy

5.8%
7.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
3.9%

Utilities

4.4%
2.1%

Basic Materials

3.4%
6.9%

Communication Services

2.0%
4.4%

Financial Services

ISCV
22.4%
IJS
19.4%

Consumer Cyclical

ISCV
15.6%
IJS
15.4%

Industrials

ISCV
12.7%
IJS
11.6%

Real Estate

ISCV
11.5%
IJS
8.6%

Healthcare

ISCV
8.7%
IJS
7.3%

Technology

ISCV
8.1%
IJS
13.4%

Energy

ISCV
5.8%
IJS
7.0%

Consumer Defensive

ISCV
4.7%
IJS
3.9%

Utilities

ISCV
4.4%
IJS
2.1%

Basic Materials

ISCV
3.4%
IJS
6.9%

Communication Services

ISCV
2.0%
IJS
4.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISCV vs. IJS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISCV
ISCV Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
ISCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISCV Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
ISCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISCV Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

IJS
IJS Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
IJS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJS Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
IJS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJS Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISCV vs. IJS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF (ISCV) and iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ISCVIJSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.37

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.23

4.26

-1.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.27

14.04

-2.77

ISCV vs. IJS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISCV Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the IJS Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISCV and IJS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ISCV vs. IJS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISCV drawdown since its inception was -63.14%, which is greater than IJS's maximum drawdown of -60.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISCV and IJS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISCVIJSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.14%

-60.11%

-3.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.25%

-9.28%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.35%

-28.65%

+3.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.35%

-28.65%

+3.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.56%

-47.68%

-3.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.97%

-1.42%

+0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.12%

-9.87%

+0.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.65%

2.81%

-0.16%

Volatility

ISCV vs. IJS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF (ISCV) is 3.79%, while iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS) has a volatility of 4.84%. This indicates that ISCV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IJS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISCVIJSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.79%

4.84%

-1.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.58%

11.82%

-1.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.32%

18.38%

-2.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.78%

21.94%

-1.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.31%

23.62%

-0.31%

ISCV vs. IJS - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISCV has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than IJS's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ISCV vs. IJS - Dividend Comparison

ISCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, more than IJS's 1.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IJS
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF
1.35%1.62%1.78%1.42%1.46%1.52%1.00%1.66%1.75%1.41%1.22%1.59%
ISCV
iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF
1.91%2.04%2.01%2.21%2.12%1.95%2.01%2.36%2.48%1.74%2.49%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, ISCV and IJS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IJS has higher volatility (4.84%) compared to ISCV (3.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISCV dropped -63.14% vs IJS's -60.11%.

On 10-year performance, IJS leads with 10.51% vs 9.06% for ISCV. On fees, ISCV is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, ISCV has been the lower-risk option at 3.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IJS has performed better with a 10.51% return vs 9.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ISCV is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IJS.

ISCV has the higher dividend yield at 1.91%, compared with 1.35% for IJS.

ISCV tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Broad Value Extended Index, while IJS tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for ISCV and 0.25% for IJS.

IJS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISCV and IJS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer