SMIDX vs. GIPIX
Compare and contrast key facts about SMI Dynamic Allocation Fund (SMIDX) and Goldman Sachs Balanced Strategy Portfolio (GIPIX).
SMIDX is managed by SMI Funds. It was launched on Feb 27, 2013. GIPIX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Jan 1, 1998.
Performance
SMIDX vs. GIPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SMIDX vs. GIPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMIDX SMI Dynamic Allocation Fund | -1.27% | 22.50% | 12.76% | 8.39% | -19.12% | 14.00% | 9.64% | 9.47% | -6.12% | 14.11% |
GIPIX Goldman Sachs Balanced Strategy Portfolio | -2.44% | 10.80% | 8.51% | 12.49% | -14.43% | 7.94% | 11.09% | 15.68% | -6.52% | 11.63% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMIDX achieves a -1.27% return, which is significantly higher than GIPIX's -2.44% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SMIDX having a 5.70% annualized return and GIPIX not far behind at 5.45%.
SMIDX
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -8.73%
- YTD
- -1.27%
- 6M
- 3.23%
- 1Y
- 18.80%
- 3Y*
- 11.75%
- 5Y*
- 6.12%
- 10Y*
- 5.70%
GIPIX
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -5.43%
- YTD
- -2.44%
- 6M
- -0.36%
- 1Y
- 8.91%
- 3Y*
- 8.13%
- 5Y*
- 3.82%
- 10Y*
- 5.45%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SMIDX vs. GIPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMIDX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is higher than GIPIX's 0.19% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SMIDX vs. GIPIX — Risk / Return Rank
SMIDX
GIPIX
SMIDX vs. GIPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SMI Dynamic Allocation Fund (SMIDX) and Goldman Sachs Balanced Strategy Portfolio (GIPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMIDX | GIPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.50 | 1.14 | +0.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.05 | 1.60 | +0.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.24 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.07 | 0.93 | +1.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.71 | 4.10 | +4.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMIDX | GIPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.50 | 1.14 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.49 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.68 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.64 | -0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between SMIDX and GIPIX is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SMIDX vs. GIPIX - Dividend Comparison
SMIDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.98%, more than GIPIX's 5.95% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMIDX SMI Dynamic Allocation Fund | 11.98% | 11.83% | 6.43% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 7.91% | 5.32% | 1.22% | 1.53% | 0.92% | 0.25% | 1.27% |
GIPIX Goldman Sachs Balanced Strategy Portfolio | 5.95% | 5.22% | 4.06% | 2.12% | 4.56% | 6.37% | 2.25% | 2.51% | 4.70% | 4.51% | 1.46% | 5.73% |
Drawdowns
SMIDX vs. GIPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMIDX drawdown since its inception was -21.99%, smaller than the maximum GIPIX drawdown of -29.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMIDX and GIPIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMIDX | GIPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.99% | -29.46% | +7.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.73% | -6.33% | -2.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.99% | -20.65% | -1.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.99% | -20.65% | -1.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.73% | -5.50% | -3.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.39% | -3.70% | -2.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.07% | 1.65% | +0.42% |
Volatility
SMIDX vs. GIPIX - Volatility Comparison
SMI Dynamic Allocation Fund (SMIDX) has a higher volatility of 4.98% compared to Goldman Sachs Balanced Strategy Portfolio (GIPIX) at 2.94%. This indicates that SMIDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GIPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SMIDX | GIPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.98% | 2.94% | +2.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.81% | 4.78% | +5.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.84% | 8.09% | +4.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.58% | 7.93% | +2.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.05% | 8.06% | +1.99% |