SMIDX vs. QQQ

In the year-to-date period, SMIDX achieves a 5.42% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's 1.69% return. Over the past 10 years, SMIDX has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 1.51%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 17.69% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

SMIDX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.20% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SMI Dynamic Allocation Fund (SMIDX) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current SMIDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is comparable to the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMIDX and QQQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

SMIDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.10%, more than QQQ's 0.58% yield.

The maximum SMIDX drawdown since its inception was -27.40%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMIDX and QQQ.

The current volatility for SMI Dynamic Allocation Fund (SMIDX) is 2.03%, while Invesco QQQ (QQQ) has a volatility of 5.62%. This indicates that SMIDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.