PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMIDX vs. MOJOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMIDX vs. MOJOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SMI Dynamic Allocation Fund (SMIDX) and Donoghue Forlines Momentum Fund (MOJOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMIDX achieves a 10.26% return, which is significantly lower than MOJOX's 43.41% return.


SMIDX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.48%
YTD
10.26%
6M
8.81%
1Y
26.17%
3Y*
15.70%
5Y*
6.97%
10Y*
6.47%

MOJOX

1D
1.22%
1M
7.62%
YTD
43.41%
6M
41.15%
1Y
60.93%
3Y*
34.08%
5Y*
15.99%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMIDX vs. MOJOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMIDX
SMI Dynamic Allocation Fund
10.26%22.50%12.76%8.39%-19.12%14.00%9.64%9.47%-6.12%14.11%
MOJOX
Donoghue Forlines Momentum Fund
43.41%22.91%22.29%19.10%-22.78%28.86%-1.95%8.66%-3.03%14.80%

Correlation

The correlation between SMIDX and MOJOX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.67

The correlation between SMIDX and MOJOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMIDX vs. MOJOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMIDX
SMIDX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
SMIDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMIDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMIDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
SMIDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMIDX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

MOJOX
MOJOX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
MOJOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOJOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOJOX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
MOJOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOJOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMIDX vs. MOJOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SMI Dynamic Allocation Fund (SMIDX) and Donoghue Forlines Momentum Fund (MOJOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SMIDXMOJOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.51

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

7.65

-4.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.09

28.97

-16.88

SMIDX vs. MOJOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMIDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is lower than the MOJOX Sharpe Ratio of 3.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMIDX and MOJOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SMIDX vs. MOJOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMIDX drawdown since its inception was -21.99%, smaller than the maximum MOJOX drawdown of -28.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMIDX and MOJOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMIDXMOJOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.99%

-28.85%

+6.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.73%

-8.15%

-0.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.11%

-22.50%

+12.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.99%

-25.32%

+3.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.67%

0.00%

-1.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.30%

-7.81%

+1.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.22%

2.15%

+0.07%

Volatility

SMIDX vs. MOJOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SMI Dynamic Allocation Fund (SMIDX) is 5.50%, while Donoghue Forlines Momentum Fund (MOJOX) has a volatility of 8.26%. This indicates that SMIDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MOJOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMIDXMOJOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.50%

8.26%

-2.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.37%

17.12%

-5.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.05%

20.67%

-7.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.87%

17.75%

-6.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.31%

16.22%

-5.91%

SMIDX vs. MOJOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMIDX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is lower than MOJOX's 2.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMIDX vs. MOJOX - Dividend Comparison

SMIDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.73%, less than MOJOX's 18.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MOJOX
Donoghue Forlines Momentum Fund
18.70%26.83%2.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%5.49%5.78%4.75%0.00%0.00%
SMIDX
SMI Dynamic Allocation Fund
10.73%11.83%6.43%0.19%0.00%7.91%5.32%1.22%1.53%0.92%0.25%1.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMIDX and MOJOX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MOJOX has higher volatility (8.26%) compared to SMIDX (5.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMIDX dropped -21.99% vs MOJOX's -28.85%.

MOJOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMIDX and MOJOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer