PortfoliosLab logo
GIPIX vs. FFRHX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between GIPIX and FFRHX is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

GIPIX vs. FFRHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Balanced Strategy Portfolio (GIPIX) and Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GIPIX:

0.93

FFRHX:

1.98

Sortino Ratio

GIPIX:

1.21

FFRHX:

2.82

Omega Ratio

GIPIX:

1.17

FFRHX:

1.66

Calmar Ratio

GIPIX:

0.89

FFRHX:

1.70

Martin Ratio

GIPIX:

3.69

FFRHX:

8.23

Ulcer Index

GIPIX:

1.98%

FFRHX:

0.68%

Daily Std Dev

GIPIX:

8.63%

FFRHX:

3.22%

Max Drawdown

GIPIX:

-29.51%

FFRHX:

-22.19%

Current Drawdown

GIPIX:

-0.37%

FFRHX:

0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GIPIX achieves a 2.41% return, which is significantly higher than FFRHX's 0.77% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GIPIX having a 4.80% annualized return and FFRHX not far behind at 4.63%.


GIPIX

YTD

2.41%

1M

2.18%

6M

0.34%

1Y

7.94%

3Y*

5.75%

5Y*

5.63%

10Y*

4.80%

FFRHX

YTD

0.77%

1M

1.11%

6M

1.77%

1Y

6.42%

3Y*

7.98%

5Y*

7.06%

10Y*

4.63%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GIPIX vs. FFRHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GIPIX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than FFRHX's 0.67% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GIPIX vs. FFRHX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GIPIX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GIPIX is 7070
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GIPIX is 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GIPIX is 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GIPIX is 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GIPIX is 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GIPIX is 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

FFRHX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FFRHX is 9292
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FFRHX is 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FFRHX is 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FFRHX is 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FFRHX is 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FFRHX is 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GIPIX vs. FFRHX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Balanced Strategy Portfolio (GIPIX) and Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current GIPIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is lower than the FFRHX Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIPIX and FFRHX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

GIPIX vs. FFRHX - Dividend Comparison

GIPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.48%, less than FFRHX's 8.03% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GIPIX
Goldman Sachs Balanced Strategy Portfolio
4.48%4.06%2.12%5.45%6.36%2.25%2.52%4.70%4.51%1.46%5.64%3.21%
FFRHX
Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund
8.03%8.33%8.25%5.06%3.27%3.85%5.17%4.75%4.05%3.94%4.25%4.00%

Drawdowns

GIPIX vs. FFRHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIPIX drawdown since its inception was -29.51%, which is greater than FFRHX's maximum drawdown of -22.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIPIX and FFRHX.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

GIPIX vs. FFRHX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Balanced Strategy Portfolio (GIPIX) has a higher volatility of 1.79% compared to Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX) at 0.63%. This indicates that GIPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFRHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...