GIPIX vs. FFRHX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

GIPIX (Goldman Sachs Balanced Strategy Portfolio) and FFRHX (Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund) are both mutual funds - GIPIX is a Tactical Allocation fund managed by Goldman Sachs, while FFRHX is a Bank Loan fund actively managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, GIPIX returned 6.19%/yr vs 4.94%/yr for FFRHX. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GIPIX charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.67%/yr for FFRHX.

Performance

GIPIX vs. FFRHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Balanced Strategy Portfolio (GIPIX) and Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GIPIX achieves a 5.50% return, which is significantly higher than FFRHX's 1.71% return. Over the past 10 years, GIPIX has outperformed FFRHX with an annualized return of 6.19%, while FFRHX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.94% annualized return.

GIPIX

• 1D: 0.68%
• 1M: 1.30%
• YTD: 5.50%
• 6M: 5.56%
• 1Y: 14.79%
• 3Y*: 10.26%
• 5Y*: 4.76%
• 10Y*: 6.19%

FFRHX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.22%
• YTD: 1.71%
• 6M: 2.32%
• 1Y: 5.89%
• 3Y*: 7.17%
• 5Y*: 5.40%
• 10Y*: 4.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GIPIX vs. FFRHX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GIPIX Goldman Sachs Balanced Strategy Portfolio	5.50%	10.80%	8.51%	12.49%	-14.43%	7.94%	11.09%	15.68%	-6.52%	11.63%
FFRHX Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund	1.71%	5.47%	7.10%	12.63%	-1.55%	5.01%	1.69%	8.63%	0.10%	3.91%

Correlation

The correlation between GIPIX and FFRHX is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.25
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.29
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.33
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2000	0.26

Return for Risk

GIPIX vs. FFRHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GIPIX

GIPIX Risk / Return Rank: 62
GIPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
GIPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
GIPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 68
GIPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
GIPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 61

FFRHX

FFRHX Risk / Return Rank: 92
FFRHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
FFRHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
FFRHX Omega Ratio Rank: 97
FFRHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
FFRHX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GIPIX vs. FFRHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Balanced Strategy Portfolio (GIPIX) and Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GIPIX	FFRHX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.16	2.50	-0.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.09	5.94	-2.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.87	-0.46
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.65	4.97	-2.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.43	17.11	-5.68

GIPIX vs. FFRHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GIPIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the FFRHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIPIX and FFRHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GIPIX vs. FFRHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIPIX drawdown since its inception was -29.46%, which is greater than FFRHX's maximum drawdown of -22.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIPIX and FFRHX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GIPIX	FFRHX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.46%	-22.20%	-7.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.59%	-1.19%	-4.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.11%	-3.29%	-5.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.65%	-5.90%	-14.75%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-20.65%	-22.20%	+1.55%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.08%	-0.44%	+0.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.68%	-1.15%	-2.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.29%	0.35%	+0.94%

Volatility

GIPIX vs. FFRHX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Balanced Strategy Portfolio (GIPIX) has a higher volatility of 2.68% compared to Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX) at 0.66%. This indicates that GIPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFRHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GIPIX	FFRHX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.68%	0.66%	+2.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.75%	1.63%	+4.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.84%	2.37%	+4.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.06%	2.88%	+5.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.14%	4.14%	+4.00%

GIPIX vs. FFRHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GIPIX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than FFRHX's 0.67% expense ratio.

Dividends

GIPIX vs. FFRHX - Dividend Comparison

GIPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.51%, less than FFRHX's 7.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FFRHX Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund	7.09%	7.41%	6.94%	8.24%	3.81%	2.74%	3.84%	5.15%	4.74%	4.05%	4.44%	3.69%
GIPIX Goldman Sachs Balanced Strategy Portfolio	5.51%	5.22%	4.06%	2.12%	4.56%	6.37%	2.25%	2.51%	4.70%	4.51%	1.46%	5.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GIPIX and FFRHX in my portfolio?

GIPIX and FFRHX have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GIPIX or FFRHX?

GIPIX has higher volatility (2.68%) compared to FFRHX (0.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIPIX dropped -29.46% vs FFRHX's -22.20%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFRHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.