SMHC vs. CXSE
SMHC (VanEck China Semiconductor ETF) and CXSE (WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund) are both China Equities funds - SMHC tracks the MarketVector China Semiconductor 25 Index while CXSE tracks the WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SMHC charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for CXSE.
Performance
SMHC vs. CXSE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SMHC
- 1D
- -6.17%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CXSE
- 1D
- -3.30%
- 1M
- -3.84%
- 6M
- -10.24%
- YTD
- -6.60%
- 1Y
- 4.03%
- 3Y*
- 7.62%
- 5Y*
- -8.56%
- 10Y*
- 6.31%
SMHC vs. CXSE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SMHC VanEck China Semiconductor ETF | -15.04% |
CXSE WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund | -2.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMHC and CXSE is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2026 | 0.82 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMHC vs. CXSE — Risk / Return Rank
SMHC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CXSE
SMHC vs. CXSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck China Semiconductor ETF (SMHC) and WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMHC | CXSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.05 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.23 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 0.42 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMHC vs. CXSE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMHC drawdown since its inception was -24.16%, smaller than the maximum CXSE drawdown of -70.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMHC and CXSE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMHC | CXSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.16% | -70.01% | +45.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -17.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -32.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -61.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -70.01% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.16% | -50.04% | +25.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.02% | -28.00% | +18.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 9.67% | — |
Volatility
SMHC vs. CXSE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMHC | CXSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.66% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.99% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 80.83% | 22.44% | +58.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 80.83% | 32.37% | +48.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 80.83% | 28.77% | +52.06% |
SMHC vs. CXSE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMHC has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than CXSE's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMHC vs. CXSE - Dividend Comparison
SMHC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CXSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CXSE WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund | 1.55% | 1.95% | 1.70% | 1.71% | 1.55% | 0.86% | 0.54% | 0.96% | 1.49% | 1.24% | 1.39% | 2.50% |
SMHC VanEck China Semiconductor ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMHC and CXSE have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CXSE is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CXSE is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SMHC.
CXSE has the higher dividend yield at 1.55%, compared with 0.00% for SMHC.
SMHC tracks MarketVector China Semiconductor 25 Index, while CXSE tracks WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for SMHC and 0.32% for CXSE.
Find the right allocation for SMHC and CXSE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer