PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMHB vs. VGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMHB vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged US Small Cap High Dividend ETN Series B (SMHB) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMHB achieves a 5.72% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 31.64% return.


SMHB

1D
-1.45%
1M
-1.99%
YTD
5.72%
6M
0.84%
1Y
11.36%
3Y*
9.31%
5Y*
-6.36%
10Y*

VGT

1D
-1.48%
1M
18.07%
YTD
31.64%
6M
30.51%
1Y
60.15%
3Y*
33.48%
5Y*
22.23%
10Y*
25.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMHB vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SMHB
ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged US Small Cap High Dividend ETN Series B
5.72%-7.75%-15.85%35.96%-36.03%68.86%-43.21%13.05%-24.78%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
31.64%21.77%29.30%52.66%-29.70%30.45%46.04%48.62%-6.23%

Correlation

The correlation between SMHB and VGT is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2018

0.44

The correlation between SMHB and VGT shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (1 year) to 0.46 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMHB vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMHB
SMHB Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
SMHB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMHB Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMHB Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
SMHB Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMHB Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMHB vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged US Small Cap High Dividend ETN Series B (SMHB) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMHBVGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.47

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.45

3.69

-3.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.10

11.77

-10.67

SMHB vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMHB Sharpe Ratio is 0.29, which is lower than the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 2.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMHB and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMHBVGTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

2.95

-2.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.13

0.89

-1.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.10

0.68

-0.78

Drawdowns

SMHB vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMHB drawdown since its inception was -90.30%, which is greater than VGT's maximum drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMHB and VGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMHBVGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.30%

-54.63%

-35.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.16%

-16.40%

-8.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.05%

-27.23%

-17.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.85%

-35.07%

-23.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-41.81%

-1.48%

-40.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.21%

-7.95%

-29.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.38%

5.13%

+5.25%

Volatility

SMHB vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged US Small Cap High Dividend ETN Series B (SMHB) has a higher volatility of 7.35% compared to Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) at 6.39%. This indicates that SMHB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMHBVGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.35%

6.39%

+0.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.74%

16.07%

+9.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.92%

20.57%

+18.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.93%

25.18%

+23.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

66.33%

24.60%

+41.73%

SMHB vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMHB has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMHB vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

SMHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.00%, more than VGT's 0.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SMHB
ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged US Small Cap High Dividend ETN Series B
21.00%22.22%21.95%15.27%24.18%12.22%16.86%19.97%0.91%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.31%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMHB and VGT have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMHB has higher volatility (7.35%) compared to VGT (6.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMHB dropped -90.30% vs VGT's -54.63%.

On 5-year performance, VGT leads with 22.23% vs -6.36% for SMHB. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VGT has been the lower-risk option at 6.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VGT has performed better with a 22.23% return vs -6.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for SMHB.

SMHB has the higher dividend yield at 21.00%, compared with 0.31% for VGT.

SMHB is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while VGT is Technology Equities. SMHB tracks Solactive US Small Cap High Dividend Index (200%), while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for SMHB and 0.09% for VGT.

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMHB and VGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer