SMHB vs. FBGX
SMHB (ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged US Small Cap High Dividend ETN Series B) and FBGX (UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds from UBS - SMHB tracks the Solactive US Small Cap High Dividend Index (200%) while FBGX tracks the Russell 1000 Growth Index (200%). Both are passively managed. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMHB charges 0.85%/yr vs 1.29%/yr for FBGX.
Performance
SMHB vs. FBGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SMHB
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- -1.99%
- YTD
- 5.72%
- 6M
- 0.84%
- 1Y
- 11.36%
- 3Y*
- 9.31%
- 5Y*
- -6.36%
- 10Y*
- —
FBGX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMHB vs. FBGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMHB ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged US Small Cap High Dividend ETN Series B | 5.72% | -7.75% | -15.85% | 35.96% | -36.03% | 68.86% | -43.21% | 13.05% | -24.78% |
FBGX UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 35.73% | 83.74% | -56.41% | 57.04% | 65.79% | 75.84% | -20.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMHB and FBGX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2018 | 0.40 |
The correlation between SMHB and FBGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (3 years) to 0.41 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMHB vs. FBGX — Risk / Return Rank
SMHB
FBGX
SMHB vs. FBGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged US Small Cap High Dividend ETN Series B (SMHB) and UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMHB | FBGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.45 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.10 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMHB | FBGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.13 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.10 | — | — |
Drawdowns
SMHB vs. FBGX - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMHB | FBGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.05% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.81% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.21% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.38% | — | — |
Volatility
SMHB vs. FBGX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMHB | FBGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.35% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.74% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.92% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.93% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 66.33% | — | — |
SMHB vs. FBGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMHB has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than FBGX's 1.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMHB vs. FBGX - Dividend Comparison
SMHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.00%, while FBGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBGX UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMHB ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged US Small Cap High Dividend ETN Series B | 21.00% | 22.22% | 21.95% | 15.27% | 24.18% | 12.22% | 16.86% | 19.97% | 0.91% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMHB and FBGX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SMHB is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SMHB is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for FBGX.
SMHB has the higher dividend yield at 21.00%, compared with 0.00% for FBGX.
SMHB tracks Solactive US Small Cap High Dividend Index (200%), while FBGX tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index (200%). Their fees differ too: 0.85% for SMHB and 1.29% for FBGX.
Find the right allocation for SMHB and FBGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer