SMH vs. TSLL

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) and TSLL (Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, while TSLL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Direxion. SMH is passively managed, while TSLL is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, SMH returned 62.28%/yr vs -7.12%/yr for TSLL. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMH charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.83%/yr for TSLL.

Performance

SMH vs. TSLL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF (TSLL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMH achieves a 72.73% return, which is significantly higher than TSLL's -37.67% return.

SMH

• 1D: -7.01%
• 1M: 7.93%
• YTD: 72.73%
• 6M: 71.29%
• 1Y: 138.23%
• 3Y*: 62.28%
• 5Y*: 38.18%
• 10Y*: 37.85%

TSLL

• 1D: -12.25%
• 1M: -22.54%
• YTD: -37.67%
• 6M: -46.82%
• 1Y: -13.37%
• 3Y*: -7.12%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMH vs. TSLL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	72.73%	49.17%	39.10%	73.38%	-14.27%
TSLL Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF	-37.67%	-26.80%	99.63%	139.86%	-74.99%

Correlation

The correlation between SMH and TSLL is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2022	0.48

SMH vs. TSLL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SMH	TSLL
Technology	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	100.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

SMH vs. TSLL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMH

SMH Risk / Return Rank: 94
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 92
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 96

TSLL

TSLL Risk / Return Rank: 8
TSLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
TSLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
TSLL Omega Ratio Rank: 10
TSLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
TSLL Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMH vs. TSLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF (TSLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SMH	TSLL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.99	-0.15	+4.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.05	0.39	+3.66
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.58	1.04	+0.53
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	9.31	-0.25	+9.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	33.88	-0.49	+34.37

SMH vs. TSLL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMH Sharpe Ratio is 3.99, which is higher than the TSLL Sharpe Ratio of -0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMH and TSLL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SMH vs. TSLL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMH drawdown since its inception was -84.96%, roughly equal to the maximum TSLL drawdown of -82.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMH and TSLL.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMH	TSLL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-84.96%	-82.88%	-2.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.93%	-54.75%	+39.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-35.74%	-82.88%	+47.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.30%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.30%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.01%	-68.52%	+61.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-41.01%	-53.92%	+12.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.10%	27.78%	-23.68%

Volatility

SMH vs. TSLL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) is 19.08%, while Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF (TSLL) has a volatility of 28.98%. This indicates that SMH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SMH	TSLL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.08%	28.98%	-9.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.18%	56.84%	-27.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.87%	89.07%	-54.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.83%	106.91%	-71.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.97%	106.91%	-73.94%

SMH vs. TSLL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than TSLL's 0.83% expense ratio.

Dividends

SMH vs. TSLL - Dividend Comparison

SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than TSLL's 8.21% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	0.18%	0.31%	0.44%	0.60%	1.18%	0.51%	0.69%	1.50%	1.88%	1.43%	0.80%	2.14%
TSLL Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF	8.21%	5.00%	2.47%	4.44%	1.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMH and TSLL in my portfolio?

SMH and TSLL have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SMH or TSLL?

TSLL has higher volatility (28.98%) compared to SMH (19.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMH dropped -84.96% vs TSLL's -82.88%.

Which ETF is better, SMH or TSLL?

On 3-year performance, SMH leads with 62.28% vs -7.12% for TSLL. On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, SMH has been the lower-risk option at 19.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SMH or TSLL?

Over the 3-year period, SMH has performed better with a 62.28% return vs -7.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SMH or TSLL?

SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.83% for TSLL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SMH or TSLL?

TSLL has the higher dividend yield at 8.21%, compared with 0.18% for SMH.

What is the main difference between SMH and TSLL?

SMH is categorized as Semiconductors, while TSLL is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SMH and 0.83% for TSLL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.99 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.