SMH vs. SFM
SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) is Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, while SFM (Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, SMH returned 37.49%/yr vs 14.32%/yr for SFM. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SMH vs. SFM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMH achieves a 72.15% return, which is significantly higher than SFM's 8.36% return. Over the past 10 years, SMH has outperformed SFM with an annualized return of 37.49%, while SFM has yielded a comparatively lower 14.32% annualized return.
SMH
- 1D
- 1.72%
- 1M
- 8.30%
- YTD
- 72.15%
- 6M
- 75.62%
- 1Y
- 136.32%
- 3Y*
- 60.05%
- 5Y*
- 38.42%
- 10Y*
- 37.49%
SFM
- 1D
- -2.03%
- 1M
- -2.20%
- YTD
- 8.36%
- 6M
- 8.54%
- 1Y
- -45.03%
- 3Y*
- 35.31%
- 5Y*
- 24.38%
- 10Y*
- 14.32%
SMH vs. SFM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 72.15% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
SFM Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. | 8.36% | -37.30% | 164.12% | 48.63% | 9.06% | 47.66% | 3.88% | -17.69% | -3.45% | 28.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMH and SFM is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2013 | 0.16 |
The correlation between SMH and SFM shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMH vs. SFM — Risk / Return Rank
SMH
SFM
SMH vs. SFM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. (SFM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMH | SFM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +5.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.60 | 0.81 | +0.79 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.18 | -0.73 | +9.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 33.74 | -0.99 | +34.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMH vs. SFM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMH drawdown since its inception was -84.96%, which is greater than SFM's maximum drawdown of -72.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMH and SFM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMH | SFM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.96% | -72.88% | -12.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.93% | -62.17% | +47.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.74% | -63.48% | +27.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.30% | -63.48% | +18.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.30% | -63.48% | +18.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.81% | -51.91% | +49.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.04% | -40.28% | -0.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.06% | 45.41% | -41.35% |
Volatility
SMH vs. SFM - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a higher volatility of 16.25% compared to Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. (SFM) at 12.50%. This indicates that SMH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SFM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMH | SFM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.25% | 12.50% | +3.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.73% | 30.32% | -2.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.20% | 46.09% | -12.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.47% | 39.23% | -3.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.82% | 37.82% | -5.00% |
Dividends
SMH vs. SFM - Dividend Comparison
SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, while SFM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SFM Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMH and SFM have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (16.25%) compared to SFM (12.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMH dropped -84.96% vs SFM's -72.88%.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.13 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMH and SFM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer