SMH vs. PDBC
SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) and PDBC (Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, while PDBC is a Commodities fund actively managed by Invesco. SMH is passively managed, while PDBC is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, SMH returned 37.49%/yr vs 7.99%/yr for PDBC. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMH charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for PDBC.
Performance
SMH vs. PDBC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMH achieves a 72.15% return, which is significantly higher than PDBC's 28.75% return. Over the past 10 years, SMH has outperformed PDBC with an annualized return of 37.49%, while PDBC has yielded a comparatively lower 7.99% annualized return.
SMH
- 1D
- 1.72%
- 1M
- 7.20%
- YTD
- 72.15%
- 6M
- 75.62%
- 1Y
- 141.99%
- 3Y*
- 60.05%
- 5Y*
- 38.42%
- 10Y*
- 37.49%
PDBC
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- -8.28%
- YTD
- 28.75%
- 6M
- 30.02%
- 1Y
- 30.88%
- 3Y*
- 12.43%
- 5Y*
- 10.98%
- 10Y*
- 7.99%
SMH vs. PDBC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 72.15% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 28.75% | 5.96% | 2.09% | -6.25% | 19.23% | 41.72% | -7.84% | 11.44% | -12.78% | 5.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMH and PDBC is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2014 | 0.18 |
The correlation between SMH and PDBC shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMH vs. PDBC — Risk / Return Rank
SMH
PDBC
SMH vs. PDBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMH | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.60 | 1.32 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.18 | 3.55 | +5.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 33.74 | 9.49 | +24.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMH vs. PDBC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMH drawdown since its inception was -84.96%, which is greater than PDBC's maximum drawdown of -49.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMH and PDBC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMH | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.96% | -49.52% | -35.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.93% | -9.78% | -5.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.74% | -13.95% | -21.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.30% | -27.63% | -17.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.30% | -40.73% | -4.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.81% | -9.78% | +6.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.04% | -23.16% | -17.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.06% | 3.65% | +0.41% |
Volatility
SMH vs. PDBC - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a higher volatility of 16.25% compared to Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC) at 4.91%. This indicates that SMH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMH | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.25% | 4.91% | +11.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.73% | 16.12% | +11.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.20% | 18.85% | +14.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.47% | 19.16% | +16.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.82% | 17.79% | +15.03% |
SMH vs. PDBC - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than PDBC's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMH vs. PDBC - Dividend Comparison
SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than PDBC's 2.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 2.98% | 3.84% | 4.42% | 4.21% | 13.05% | 50.83% | 0.01% | 1.40% | 1.00% | 3.83% | 6.51% | 0.00% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMH and PDBC have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (16.25%) compared to PDBC (4.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMH dropped -84.96% vs PDBC's -49.52%.
On 10-year performance, SMH leads with 37.49% vs 7.99% for PDBC. On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, PDBC has been the lower-risk option at 4.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SMH has performed better with a 37.49% return vs 7.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PDBC.
PDBC has the higher dividend yield at 2.98%, compared with 0.18% for SMH.
SMH is categorized as Semiconductors, while PDBC is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SMH and 0.58% for PDBC.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.13 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMH and PDBC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer