PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMH vs. MAGS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SMH vs. MAGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SMH vs. MAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
8.84%49.17%39.10%38.06%
MAGS
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF
-11.04%22.99%63.97%37.32%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMH achieves a 8.84% return, which is significantly higher than MAGS's -11.04% return.


SMH

1D
2.24%
1M
-3.55%
YTD
8.84%
6M
17.83%
1Y
85.04%
3Y*
44.53%
5Y*
26.15%
10Y*
31.58%

MAGS

1D
1.28%
1M
-4.76%
YTD
-11.04%
6M
-8.69%
1Y
27.53%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SMH vs. MAGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than MAGS's 0.29% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SMH vs. MAGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMH
SMH Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

MAGS
MAGS Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
MAGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAGS Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
MAGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAGS Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMH vs. MAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMHMAGSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.32

0.97

+1.35

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.92

1.58

+1.34

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.21

+0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.39

1.60

+3.79

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

19.22

5.57

+13.65

SMH vs. MAGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMH Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is higher than the MAGS Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMH and MAGS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMHMAGSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32

0.97

+1.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

1.36

-1.07

Correlation

The correlation between SMH and MAGS is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

SMH vs. MAGS - Dividend Comparison

SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than MAGS's 1.66% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
0.28%0.31%0.44%0.60%1.18%0.51%0.69%1.50%1.88%1.43%0.80%2.14%
MAGS
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF
1.66%1.48%0.81%0.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

SMH vs. MAGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMH drawdown since its inception was -84.96%, which is greater than MAGS's maximum drawdown of -29.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMH and MAGS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SMHMAGSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.96%

-29.91%

-55.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.95%

-18.62%

+2.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.02%

-13.78%

+5.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.35%

-4.77%

-36.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.47%

5.36%

-0.89%

Volatility

SMH vs. MAGS - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a higher volatility of 11.74% compared to Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) at 8.50%. This indicates that SMH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SMHMAGSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.74%

8.50%

+3.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.02%

15.51%

+8.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.88%

28.70%

+8.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.68%

26.28%

+8.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.29%

26.28%

+6.01%