SMH vs. IJR
SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) and IJR (iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, while IJR is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SMH returned 38.18%/yr vs 11.21%/yr for IJR. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SMH charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for IJR.
Performance
SMH vs. IJR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMH achieves a 79.69% return, which is significantly higher than IJR's 19.86% return. Over the past 10 years, SMH has outperformed IJR with an annualized return of 38.18%, while IJR has yielded a comparatively lower 11.21% annualized return.
SMH
- 1D
- 4.38%
- 1M
- 16.31%
- YTD
- 79.69%
- 6M
- 83.94%
- 1Y
- 152.58%
- 3Y*
- 62.32%
- 5Y*
- 39.72%
- 10Y*
- 38.18%
IJR
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 7.39%
- YTD
- 19.86%
- 6M
- 16.97%
- 1Y
- 37.16%
- 3Y*
- 15.09%
- 5Y*
- 6.35%
- 10Y*
- 11.21%
SMH vs. IJR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 79.69% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
IJR iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF | 19.86% | 5.89% | 8.63% | 16.06% | -16.20% | 26.58% | 11.28% | 22.82% | -8.51% | 13.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMH and IJR is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2000 | 0.66 |
The correlation between SMH and IJR shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (3 years) to 0.66 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SMH vs. IJR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SMH
IJR
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
SMH
IJR
Basic Materials
SMH
-
IJR
Communication Services
SMH
-
IJR
Consumer Cyclical
SMH
-
IJR
Consumer Defensive
SMH
-
IJR
Energy
SMH
-
IJR
Financial Services
SMH
-
IJR
Healthcare
SMH
-
IJR
Industrials
SMH
-
IJR
Real Estate
SMH
-
IJR
Utilities
SMH
-
IJR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMH vs. IJR — Risk / Return Rank
SMH
IJR
SMH vs. IJR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMH | IJR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.65 | 1.36 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.28 | 4.30 | +5.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 37.77 | 14.44 | +23.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMH vs. IJR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMH drawdown since its inception was -84.96%, which is greater than IJR's maximum drawdown of -58.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMH and IJR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMH | IJR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.96% | -58.15% | -26.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.93% | -8.68% | -6.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.74% | -28.02% | -7.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.30% | -28.02% | -17.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.30% | -44.36% | -0.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.04% | -9.27% | -31.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.06% | 2.58% | +1.48% |
Volatility
SMH vs. IJR - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a higher volatility of 16.71% compared to iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR) at 5.17%. This indicates that SMH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IJR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMH | IJR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.71% | 5.17% | +11.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.97% | 11.93% | +16.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.39% | 17.67% | +15.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.53% | 21.44% | +14.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.86% | 22.93% | +9.93% |
SMH vs. IJR - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IJR's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMH vs. IJR - Dividend Comparison
SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than IJR's 1.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJR iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF | 1.42% | 1.44% | 2.05% | 1.31% | 1.41% | 1.53% | 1.11% | 1.44% | 1.58% | 1.20% | 1.22% | 1.48% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.17% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMH and IJR have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (16.71%) compared to IJR (5.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMH dropped -84.96% vs IJR's -58.15%.
On 10-year performance, SMH leads with 38.18% vs 11.21% for IJR. On fees, IJR is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, IJR has been the lower-risk option at 5.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SMH has performed better with a 38.18% return vs 11.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IJR is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SMH.
IJR has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 0.17% for SMH.
SMH is categorized as Semiconductors, while IJR is Small Cap Blend Equities. SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, while IJR tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SMH and 0.06% for IJR.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.61 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMH and IJR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer