SMH vs. IEMG
SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) and IEMG (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, while IEMG is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SMH returned 38.22%/yr vs 10.64%/yr for IEMG. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SMH charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for IEMG.
Performance
SMH vs. IEMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMH achieves a 83.23% return, which is significantly higher than IEMG's 28.41% return. Over the past 10 years, SMH has outperformed IEMG with an annualized return of 38.22%, while IEMG has yielded a comparatively lower 10.64% annualized return.
SMH
- 1D
- 5.76%
- 1M
- 14.50%
- YTD
- 83.23%
- 6M
- 85.82%
- 1Y
- 154.33%
- 3Y*
- 63.38%
- 5Y*
- 40.67%
- 10Y*
- 38.22%
IEMG
- 1D
- 3.14%
- 1M
- 7.13%
- YTD
- 28.41%
- 6M
- 30.61%
- 1Y
- 52.54%
- 3Y*
- 22.63%
- 5Y*
- 8.51%
- 10Y*
- 10.64%
SMH vs. IEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 83.23% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 28.41% | 32.56% | 6.50% | 11.52% | -19.98% | -0.64% | 17.87% | 17.81% | -14.92% | 37.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMH and IEMG is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2012 | 0.64 |
The correlation between SMH and IEMG shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (all time) to 0.77 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SMH vs. IEMG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SMH
IEMG
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
SMH
IEMG
Basic Materials
SMH
-
IEMG
Communication Services
SMH
-
IEMG
Consumer Cyclical
SMH
-
IEMG
Consumer Defensive
SMH
-
IEMG
Energy
SMH
-
IEMG
Financial Services
SMH
-
IEMG
Healthcare
SMH
-
IEMG
Industrials
SMH
-
IEMG
Real Estate
SMH
-
IEMG
Utilities
SMH
-
IEMG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMH vs. IEMG — Risk / Return Rank
SMH
IEMG
SMH vs. IEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMH | IEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.64 | 1.46 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.25 | 3.92 | +6.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 37.49 | 14.41 | +23.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMH vs. IEMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMH drawdown since its inception was -84.96%, which is greater than IEMG's maximum drawdown of -38.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMH and IEMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMH | IEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.96% | -38.71% | -46.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.93% | -13.21% | -1.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.74% | -17.21% | -18.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.30% | -35.75% | -9.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.30% | -38.71% | -6.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.02% | -12.94% | -28.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.07% | 3.59% | +0.48% |
Volatility
SMH vs. IEMG - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a higher volatility of 17.53% compared to iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) at 10.76%. This indicates that SMH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IEMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMH | IEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.53% | 10.76% | +6.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.48% | 19.32% | +9.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.09% | 21.41% | +12.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.67% | 18.83% | +16.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.94% | 20.22% | +12.72% |
SMH vs. IEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IEMG's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMH vs. IEMG - Dividend Comparison
SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than IEMG's 2.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 2.10% | 2.75% | 3.20% | 2.89% | 2.71% | 3.06% | 1.87% | 3.15% | 2.76% | 2.35% | 2.28% | 2.53% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.17% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMH and IEMG have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (17.53%) compared to IEMG (10.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMH dropped -84.96% vs IEMG's -38.71%.
On 10-year performance, SMH leads with 38.22% vs 10.64% for IEMG. On fees, IEMG is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, IEMG has been the lower-risk option at 10.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SMH has performed better with a 38.22% return vs 10.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IEMG is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SMH.
IEMG has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 0.17% for SMH.
SMH is categorized as Semiconductors, while IEMG is Emerging Markets Diversified. SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, while IEMG tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net). They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SMH and 0.09% for IEMG.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.49 vs 2.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMH and IEMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer