PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMH vs. IEMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMH vs. IEMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMH achieves a 83.23% return, which is significantly higher than IEMG's 28.41% return. Over the past 10 years, SMH has outperformed IEMG with an annualized return of 38.22%, while IEMG has yielded a comparatively lower 10.64% annualized return.


SMH

1D
5.76%
1M
14.50%
YTD
83.23%
6M
85.82%
1Y
154.33%
3Y*
63.38%
5Y*
40.67%
10Y*
38.22%

IEMG

1D
3.14%
1M
7.13%
YTD
28.41%
6M
30.61%
1Y
52.54%
3Y*
22.63%
5Y*
8.51%
10Y*
10.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMH vs. IEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
83.23%49.17%39.10%73.38%-33.53%42.13%55.53%64.45%-9.05%38.48%
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
28.41%32.56%6.50%11.52%-19.98%-0.64%17.87%17.81%-14.92%37.38%

Correlation

The correlation between SMH and IEMG is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2012

0.64

The correlation between SMH and IEMG shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (all time) to 0.77 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SMH vs. IEMG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SMH
IEMG

Technology

100.0%
42.1%

Basic Materials

-

6.3%

Communication Services

-

5.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

8.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.8%

Energy

-

3.3%

Financial Services

-

16.7%

Healthcare

-

3.2%

Industrials

-

8.0%

Real Estate

-

1.6%

Utilities

-

1.9%

Technology

SMH
100.0%
IEMG
42.1%

Basic Materials

SMH

-

IEMG
6.3%

Communication Services

SMH

-

IEMG
5.6%

Consumer Cyclical

SMH

-

IEMG
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

SMH

-

IEMG
2.8%

Energy

SMH

-

IEMG
3.3%

Financial Services

SMH

-

IEMG
16.7%

Healthcare

SMH

-

IEMG
3.2%

Industrials

SMH

-

IEMG
8.0%

Real Estate

SMH

-

IEMG
1.6%

Utilities

SMH

-

IEMG
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMH vs. IEMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMH
SMH Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

IEMG
IEMG Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
IEMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEMG Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
IEMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEMG Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMH vs. IEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SMHIEMGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.64

1.46

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.25

3.92

+6.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

37.49

14.41

+23.08

SMH vs. IEMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMH Sharpe Ratio is 4.49, which is higher than the IEMG Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMH and IEMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SMH vs. IEMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMH drawdown since its inception was -84.96%, which is greater than IEMG's maximum drawdown of -38.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMH and IEMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMHIEMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.96%

-38.71%

-46.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.93%

-13.21%

-1.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.74%

-17.21%

-18.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.30%

-35.75%

-9.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.30%

-38.71%

-6.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.02%

-12.94%

-28.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.07%

3.59%

+0.48%

Volatility

SMH vs. IEMG - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a higher volatility of 17.53% compared to iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) at 10.76%. This indicates that SMH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IEMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMHIEMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.53%

10.76%

+6.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.48%

19.32%

+9.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.09%

21.41%

+12.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.67%

18.83%

+16.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.94%

20.22%

+12.72%

SMH vs. IEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IEMG's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMH vs. IEMG - Dividend Comparison

SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than IEMG's 2.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
2.10%2.75%3.20%2.89%2.71%3.06%1.87%3.15%2.76%2.35%2.28%2.53%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
0.17%0.31%0.44%0.60%1.18%0.51%0.69%1.50%1.88%1.43%0.80%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMH and IEMG have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMH has higher volatility (17.53%) compared to IEMG (10.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMH dropped -84.96% vs IEMG's -38.71%.

On 10-year performance, SMH leads with 38.22% vs 10.64% for IEMG. On fees, IEMG is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, IEMG has been the lower-risk option at 10.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SMH has performed better with a 38.22% return vs 10.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IEMG is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SMH.

IEMG has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 0.17% for SMH.

SMH is categorized as Semiconductors, while IEMG is Emerging Markets Diversified. SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, while IEMG tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net). They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SMH and 0.09% for IEMG.

SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.49 vs 2.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMH and IEMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer