SMH vs. FDSVX

Last updated Jul 22, 2026

SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) and FDSVX (Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund) are both funds - SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, while FDSVX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. SMH is passively managed, while FDSVX is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, SMH returned 35.39%/yr vs 17.98%/yr for FDSVX. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SMH charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for FDSVX.

Performance

SMH vs. FDSVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund (FDSVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMH achieves a 62.19% return, which is significantly higher than FDSVX's 7.88% return. Over the past 10 years, SMH has outperformed FDSVX with an annualized return of 35.39%, while FDSVX has yielded a comparatively lower 17.98% annualized return.

SMH

• 1D: 4.52%
• 1M: -11.49%
• 6M: 49.61%
• YTD: 62.19%
• 1Y: 101.68%
• 3Y*: 56.73%
• 5Y*: 36.35%
• 10Y*: 35.39%
• ALL TIME*: 11.40%

FDSVX

• 1D: -0.01%
• 1M: -4.57%
• 6M: 9.14%
• YTD: 7.88%
• 1Y: 14.20%
• 3Y*: 20.48%
• 5Y*: 12.18%
• 10Y*: 17.98%
• ALL TIME*: 10.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMH vs. FDSVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	62.19%	49.17%	39.10%	73.38%	-33.53%	42.13%	55.53%	64.45%	-9.05%	38.48%
FDSVX Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund	7.88%	15.14%	30.19%	35.63%	-24.43%	22.93%	43.43%	33.77%	-0.33%	34.63%

Correlation

The correlation between SMH and FDSVX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2000	0.75

The correlation between SMH and FDSVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SMH vs. FDSVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMH

SMH Risk / Return Rank: 92
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 89
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 95

FDSVX

FDSVX Risk / Return Rank: 17
FDSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
FDSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
FDSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 15
FDSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
FDSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMH vs. FDSVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund (FDSVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SMH	FDSVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.74	0.78	+1.96
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.05	1.16	+1.89
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.15	+0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.09	1.14	+4.95
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.14	3.94	+16.20

SMH vs. FDSVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMH Sharpe Ratio is 2.74, which is higher than the FDSVX Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMH and FDSVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SMH vs. FDSVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMH drawdown since its inception was -84.96%, which is greater than FDSVX's maximum drawdown of -59.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMH and FDSVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMH	FDSVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-84.96%	-59.34%	-25.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.80%	-12.53%	-4.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-35.74%	-23.42%	-12.32%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.30%	-29.83%	-15.47%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.30%	-31.09%	-14.21%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.68%	-6.56%	-6.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-40.92%	-12.56%	-28.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.07%	3.62%	+1.45%

Volatility

SMH vs. FDSVX - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a higher volatility of 16.00% compared to Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund (FDSVX) at 6.50%. This indicates that SMH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDSVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SMH	FDSVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.00%	6.50%	+9.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.90%	15.00%	+16.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.27%	18.32%	+18.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.26%	20.69%	+15.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.19%	20.71%	+12.48%

SMH vs. FDSVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FDSVX's 0.62% expense ratio.

Dividends

SMH vs. FDSVX - Dividend Comparison

SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than FDSVX's 1.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDSVX Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund	1.47%	1.58%	12.81%	2.55%	3.65%	13.46%	9.63%	4.28%	5.02%	4.87%	0.09%	0.17%
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	0.19%	0.31%	0.44%	0.60%	1.18%	0.51%	0.69%	1.50%	1.88%	1.43%	0.80%	2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMH and FDSVX in my portfolio?

SMH and FDSVX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SMH or FDSVX?

SMH has higher volatility (16.00%) compared to FDSVX (6.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMH dropped -84.96% vs FDSVX's -59.34%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.