PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMH vs. FBT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMH vs. FBT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and First Trust Amex Biotechnology Index (FBT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMH achieves a 55.17% return, which is significantly higher than FBT's 18.78% return. Over the past 10 years, SMH has outperformed FBT with an annualized return of 34.79%, while FBT has yielded a comparatively lower 10.06% annualized return.


SMH

1D
0.41%
1M
-15.31%
6M
39.57%
YTD
55.17%
1Y
93.09%
3Y*
54.43%
5Y*
34.99%
10Y*
34.79%
ALL TIME*
11.21%

FBT

1D
-1.28%
1M
7.19%
6M
16.06%
YTD
18.78%
1Y
51.63%
3Y*
16.08%
5Y*
8.32%
10Y*
10.06%
ALL TIME*
13.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMH vs. FBT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
55.17%49.17%39.10%73.38%-33.53%42.13%55.53%64.45%-9.05%38.48%
FBT
First Trust Amex Biotechnology Index
18.78%24.25%5.88%2.55%-4.83%-2.26%12.96%19.74%-0.30%37.07%

Correlation

The correlation between SMH and FBT is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2006

0.52

The correlation between SMH and FBT shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (1 year) to 0.52 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SMH vs. FBT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SMH
FBT

Technology

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

100.0%

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

SMH
100.0%
FBT

-

Basic Materials

SMH

-

FBT

-

Communication Services

SMH

-

FBT

-

Consumer Cyclical

SMH

-

FBT

-

Consumer Defensive

SMH

-

FBT

-

Energy

SMH

-

FBT

-

Financial Services

SMH

-

FBT

-

Healthcare

SMH

-

FBT
100.0%

Industrials

SMH

-

FBT

-

Real Estate

SMH

-

FBT

-

Utilities

SMH

-

FBT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMH vs. FBT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMH
SMH Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

FBT
FBT Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBT Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
FBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBT Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMH vs. FBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and First Trust Amex Biotechnology Index (FBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SMHFBTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.42

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.57

3.64

+1.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.66

10.83

+7.83

SMH vs. FBT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMH Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is comparable to the FBT Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMH and FBT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SMH vs. FBT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMH drawdown since its inception was -84.96%, which is greater than FBT's maximum drawdown of -40.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMH and FBT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMHFBTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.96%

-40.51%

-44.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.80%

-14.26%

-2.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.74%

-20.05%

-15.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.30%

-28.98%

-16.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.30%

-32.37%

-12.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.46%

-4.25%

-12.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.92%

-11.11%

-29.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.01%

4.78%

+0.23%

Volatility

SMH vs. FBT - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a higher volatility of 16.43% compared to First Trust Amex Biotechnology Index (FBT) at 5.84%. This indicates that SMH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMHFBTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.43%

5.84%

+10.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.63%

15.95%

+15.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.10%

21.22%

+15.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.22%

21.97%

+14.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.16%

23.76%

+9.40%

SMH vs. FBT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FBT's 0.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMH vs. FBT - Dividend Comparison

SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, while FBT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBT
First Trust Amex Biotechnology Index
0.00%0.00%0.71%0.00%0.00%1.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.12%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
0.20%0.31%0.44%0.60%1.18%0.51%0.69%1.50%1.88%1.43%0.80%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMH and FBT have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMH has higher volatility (16.43%) compared to FBT (5.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMH dropped -84.96% vs FBT's -40.51%.

On 10-year performance, SMH leads with 34.79% vs 10.06% for FBT. On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, FBT has been the lower-risk option at 5.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SMH has performed better with a 34.79% return vs 10.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for FBT.

SMH has the higher dividend yield at 0.20%, compared with 0.00% for FBT.

SMH is categorized as Semiconductors, while FBT is Health & Biotech Equities. SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, while FBT tracks NYSE Arca Biotechnology Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SMH and 0.57% for FBT.

SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMH and FBT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer