SMH vs. EWU
SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) and EWU (iShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, while EWU is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI United Kingdom Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SMH returned 36.92%/yr vs 8.18%/yr for EWU. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SMH charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for EWU.
Performance
SMH vs. EWU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMH achieves a 66.10% return, which is significantly higher than EWU's 5.57% return. Over the past 10 years, SMH has outperformed EWU with an annualized return of 36.92%, while EWU has yielded a comparatively lower 8.18% annualized return.
SMH
- 1D
- 5.00%
- 1M
- 5.58%
- YTD
- 66.10%
- 6M
- 62.81%
- 1Y
- 137.42%
- 3Y*
- 60.43%
- 5Y*
- 37.89%
- 10Y*
- 36.92%
EWU
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -0.58%
- YTD
- 5.57%
- 6M
- 9.86%
- 1Y
- 19.69%
- 3Y*
- 16.92%
- 5Y*
- 10.75%
- 10Y*
- 8.18%
SMH vs. EWU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 66.10% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
EWU iShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF | 5.57% | 34.95% | 6.74% | 12.40% | -4.39% | 18.19% | -11.80% | 21.29% | -14.30% | 21.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMH and EWU is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2000 | 0.51 |
The correlation between SMH and EWU shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (3 years) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SMH vs. EWU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SMH
EWU
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
SMH
EWU
Basic Materials
SMH
-
EWU
Communication Services
SMH
-
EWU
Consumer Cyclical
SMH
-
EWU
Consumer Defensive
SMH
-
EWU
Energy
SMH
-
EWU
Financial Services
SMH
-
EWU
Healthcare
SMH
-
EWU
Industrials
SMH
-
EWU
Real Estate
SMH
-
EWU
Utilities
SMH
-
EWU
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMH vs. EWU — Risk / Return Rank
SMH
EWU
SMH vs. EWU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and iShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF (EWU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMH | EWU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.62 | 1.24 | +0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.26 | 1.99 | +7.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 34.80 | 7.12 | +27.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMH | EWU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.27 | 1.37 | +2.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.08 | 0.66 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.13 | 0.44 | +0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.26 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
SMH vs. EWU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMH drawdown since its inception was -84.96%, which is greater than EWU's maximum drawdown of -63.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMH and EWU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMH | EWU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.96% | -63.99% | -20.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.93% | -9.92% | -5.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.74% | -12.63% | -23.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.30% | -24.91% | -20.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.30% | -43.33% | -1.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.23% | -4.62% | -1.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.07% | -14.16% | -26.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.96% | 2.77% | +1.19% |
Volatility
SMH vs. EWU - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a higher volatility of 15.45% compared to iShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF (EWU) at 4.68%. This indicates that SMH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMH | EWU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.45% | 4.68% | +10.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.71% | 12.35% | +14.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.42% | 14.47% | +17.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.32% | 16.44% | +18.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.75% | 18.85% | +13.90% |
SMH vs. EWU - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than EWU's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMH vs. EWU - Dividend Comparison
SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than EWU's 3.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWU iShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF | 3.53% | 3.73% | 4.16% | 4.14% | 3.43% | 4.35% | 2.48% | 4.13% | 4.98% | 3.91% | 3.97% | 4.11% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMH and EWU have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (15.45%) compared to EWU (4.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMH dropped -84.96% vs EWU's -63.99%.
On 10-year performance, SMH leads with 36.92% vs 8.18% for EWU. On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, EWU has been the lower-risk option at 4.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SMH has performed better with a 36.92% return vs 8.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EWU.
EWU has the higher dividend yield at 3.53%, compared with 0.18% for SMH.
SMH is categorized as Semiconductors, while EWU is Europe Equities. SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, while EWU tracks MSCI United Kingdom Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SMH and 0.50% for EWU.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.27 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMH and EWU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer