SMH vs. COPX
SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) and COPX (Global X Copper Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, while COPX is a Materials fund tracking the Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SMH returned 37.49%/yr vs 21.86%/yr for COPX. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMH charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for COPX.
Performance
SMH vs. COPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMH achieves a 72.15% return, which is significantly higher than COPX's 19.75% return. Over the past 10 years, SMH has outperformed COPX with an annualized return of 37.49%, while COPX has yielded a comparatively lower 21.86% annualized return.
SMH
- 1D
- 1.72%
- 1M
- 8.30%
- YTD
- 72.15%
- 6M
- 75.62%
- 1Y
- 136.32%
- 3Y*
- 60.05%
- 5Y*
- 38.42%
- 10Y*
- 37.49%
COPX
- 1D
- 3.38%
- 1M
- -6.46%
- YTD
- 19.75%
- 6M
- 29.13%
- 1Y
- 103.76%
- 3Y*
- 33.96%
- 5Y*
- 19.28%
- 10Y*
- 21.86%
SMH vs. COPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 72.15% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | 19.75% | 93.50% | 3.57% | 8.38% | -0.76% | 23.39% | 51.66% | 12.48% | -31.31% | 38.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMH and COPX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2010 | 0.50 |
The correlation between SMH and COPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (3 years) to 0.57 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SMH vs. COPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SMH
COPX
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
SMH
COPX
-
Basic Materials
SMH
-
COPX
Communication Services
SMH
-
COPX
-
Consumer Cyclical
SMH
-
COPX
-
Consumer Defensive
SMH
-
COPX
-
Energy
SMH
-
COPX
-
Financial Services
SMH
-
COPX
-
Healthcare
SMH
-
COPX
-
Industrials
SMH
-
COPX
Real Estate
SMH
-
COPX
-
Utilities
SMH
-
COPX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMH vs. COPX — Risk / Return Rank
SMH
COPX
SMH vs. COPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMH | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.60 | 1.36 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.18 | 3.75 | +5.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 33.74 | 11.60 | +22.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMH vs. COPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMH drawdown since its inception was -84.96%, roughly equal to the maximum COPX drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMH and COPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMH | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.96% | -83.16% | -1.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.93% | -27.82% | +12.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.74% | -39.72% | +3.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.30% | -42.12% | -3.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.30% | -65.41% | +20.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.81% | -10.17% | +7.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.04% | -39.28% | -1.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.06% | 8.98% | -4.92% |
Volatility
SMH vs. COPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) is 16.25%, while Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) has a volatility of 19.30%. This indicates that SMH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMH | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.25% | 19.30% | -3.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.73% | 38.15% | -10.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.20% | 43.66% | -10.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.47% | 37.00% | -1.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.82% | 35.75% | -2.93% |
SMH vs. COPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than COPX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMH vs. COPX - Dividend Comparison
SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than COPX's 2.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | 2.24% | 2.68% | 1.80% | 2.39% | 3.14% | 1.48% | 1.30% | 1.37% | 2.59% | 1.57% | 0.60% | 1.20% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMH and COPX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COPX has higher volatility (19.30%) compared to SMH (16.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMH dropped -84.96% vs COPX's -83.16%.
On 10-year performance, SMH leads with 37.49% vs 21.86% for COPX. On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, SMH has been the lower-risk option at 16.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SMH has performed better with a 37.49% return vs 21.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for COPX.
COPX has the higher dividend yield at 2.24%, compared with 0.18% for SMH.
SMH is categorized as Semiconductors, while COPX is Materials. SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, while COPX tracks Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SMH and 0.65% for COPX.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.13 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMH and COPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer