SMH vs. CMG
SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) is Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, while CMG (Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, SMH returned 36.92%/yr vs 13.70%/yr for CMG. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SMH vs. CMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMH achieves a 66.10% return, which is significantly higher than CMG's -20.89% return. Over the past 10 years, SMH has outperformed CMG with an annualized return of 36.92%, while CMG has yielded a comparatively lower 13.70% annualized return.
SMH
- 1D
- 5.00%
- 1M
- 5.58%
- YTD
- 66.10%
- 6M
- 62.81%
- 1Y
- 137.42%
- 3Y*
- 60.43%
- 5Y*
- 37.89%
- 10Y*
- 36.92%
CMG
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -9.91%
- YTD
- -20.89%
- 6M
- -12.91%
- 1Y
- -44.25%
- 3Y*
- -10.49%
- 5Y*
- 1.95%
- 10Y*
- 13.70%
SMH vs. CMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 66.10% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
CMG Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. | -20.89% | -38.64% | 31.83% | 64.83% | -20.64% | 26.07% | 65.65% | 93.87% | 49.39% | -23.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMH and CMG is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2006 | 0.38 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SMH and CMG has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.38, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMH vs. CMG — Risk / Return Rank
SMH
CMG
SMH vs. CMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMH | CMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +5.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.62 | 0.78 | +0.84 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.26 | -0.86 | +10.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 34.80 | -1.27 | +36.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMH | CMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.27 | -1.16 | +5.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.08 | 0.06 | +1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.13 | 0.39 | +0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.49 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
SMH vs. CMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMH drawdown since its inception was -84.96%, which is greater than CMG's maximum drawdown of -74.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMH and CMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMH | CMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.96% | -74.61% | -10.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.93% | -51.61% | +36.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.74% | -58.89% | +23.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.30% | -58.89% | +13.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.30% | -58.89% | +13.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.23% | -57.30% | +51.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.07% | -21.35% | -19.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.96% | 34.91% | -30.95% |
Volatility
SMH vs. CMG - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a higher volatility of 15.45% compared to Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG) at 10.05%. This indicates that SMH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMH | CMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.45% | 10.05% | +5.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.71% | 23.36% | +3.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.42% | 38.50% | -6.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.32% | 33.55% | +1.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.75% | 35.63% | -2.88% |
Dividends
SMH vs. CMG - Dividend Comparison
SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, while CMG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMG Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMH and CMG have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (15.45%) compared to CMG (10.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMH dropped -84.96% vs CMG's -74.61%.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.27 vs -1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMH and CMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer